Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843462›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

COVID-19 vaccine confidence and hesitancy among health care workers: A cross-sectional survey from a MERS-CoV experienced nation.

Mazin Barry, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Abdullah Alhuzaimi, Nurah Alamro, Ayman Al-Eyadhy, Fadi Aljamaan, Basema Saddik, Ali Alhaboob, Fahad Alsohime, Khalid Alhasan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Scrutinizing the COVID-19 vaccine safety debate.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Mazin BarryDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-007X
Mohamad-Hani TemsahPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-9322
Abdullah AlhuzaimiCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-079X
Nurah AlamroCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman Al-EyadhyPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6051-9125
Fadi AljamaanCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-6652
Basema SaddikCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-4682-5927
Ali AlhaboobPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-7874
Fahad AlsohimePediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4979-3895
Khalid AlhasanPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-8536
Abdulkarim AlrabiaahPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlarajDr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7706-2328
Rabih HalwaniCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-7771
Amr JamalCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-6592
Sarah AlsubaiePediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3128-5921
Fatimah S Al-ShahraniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziad A MemishDirector Research and Innovation Centre, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health & College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5099-0714
Jaffar A Al-TawfiqSpecialty Internal Medicine and Quality Department, Johns Hopkins Aramco Health Care, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5752-2235
King Saud University · SAKing Saud Medical City · SAUniversity of Sharjah · AEAlfaisal University · SAJohns Hopkins University · USQassim University · SASulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to identify coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine perception, acceptance, confidence, hesitancy, and barriers among health care workers (HCWs).

methodsAn online national cross-sectional pilot-validated questionnaire was self-administered by HCWs in Saudi Arabia, which is a nation with MERS-CoV experience. The main outcome variable was HCWs' acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine candidates. The factors associated with vaccination acceptance were identified through a logistic regression analysis, and the level of anxiety was measured using a validated instrument to measure general anxiety levels.

resultsOut of the 1512 HCWs who completed the study questionnaire-of which 62.4% were women-70% were willing to receive COVID-19 vaccines. A logistic regression analysis revealed that male HCWs (ORa = 1.551, 95% CI: 1.122-2.144), HCWs who believe in vaccine safety (ORa = 2.151; 95% CI: 1.708-2.708), HCWs who believe that COVID vaccines are the most likely way to stop the pandemic (ORa = 1.539; 95% CI: 1.259-1.881), and HCWs who rely on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website for COVID 19 updates (ORa = 1.505, 95% CI: 1.125-2.013) were significantly associated with reporting a willingness to be vaccinated. However, HCWs who believed that the vaccines were rushed without evidence-informed testing were found to be 60% less inclined to accept COVID-19 vaccines (ORa = 0.394, 95% CI: 0.298-0.522).

conclusionMost HCWs are willing to receive COVID-19 vaccines once they are available; the satisfactoriness of COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs is crucial because health professionals' knowledge and confidence toward vaccines are important determining factors for not only their own vaccine acceptance but also recommendation for such vaccines to their patients.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusMultivariate AnalysisSaudi ArabiaVaccination HesitancyYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34843462
PMCPMC8629228
OpenAlexW3216928736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.