Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843453›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Integrating deep learning with microfluidics for biophysical classification of sickle red blood cells adhered to laminin.

Niksa Praljak, Shamreen Iram, Utku Goreke, Gundeep Singh, Ailis Hill, Umut A Gurkan, Michael Hinczewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mathematical modeling of SCD: a literature review.Journal of sickle cell disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Motion Blur Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niksa PraljakDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-1285
Shamreen IramDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4354-7407
Utku GorekeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7973-9120
Gundeep SinghDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8104-6016
Ailis HillDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Umut A GurkanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0331-9960
Michael HinczewskiDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-7697
Case Western Reserve University · USCleveland State University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
Standardized Monitoring of Cellular Adhesion to Improve Clinical Care in Sickle Cell DiseaseR01HL133574 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURKAN, UMUT A., LITTLE, JANE · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Clinical Microfluidic Assessment of Red Blood Cell Adhesion, Deformability, Cellular Hemoglobin Distribution, Cellular Density, and Blood Rheology for Curative Therapies in Sickle Cell DiseaseOT2HL152643 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURKAN, UMUT A. · 2019 to 2021
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL152643NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease, a genetic disorder affecting a sizeable global demographic, manifests in sickle red blood cells (sRBCs) with altered shape and biomechanics. sRBCs show heightened adhesive interactions with inflamed endothelium, triggering painful vascular occlusion events. Numerous studies employ microfluidic-assay-based monitoring tools to quantify characteristics of adhered sRBCs from high resolution channel images. The current image analysis workflow relies on detailed morphological characterization and cell counting by a specially trained worker. This is time and labor intensive, and prone to user bias artifacts. Here we establish a morphology based classification scheme to identify two naturally arising sRBC subpopulations-deformable and non-deformable sRBCs-utilizing novel visual markers that link to underlying cell biomechanical properties and hold promise for clinically relevant insights. We then set up a standardized, reproducible, and fully automated image analysis workflow designed to carry out this classification. This relies on a two part deep neural network architecture that works in tandem for segmentation of channel images and classification of adhered cells into subtypes. Network training utilized an extensive data set of images generated by the SCD BioChip, a microfluidic assay which injects clinical whole blood samples into protein-functionalized microchannels, mimicking physiological conditions in the microvasculature. Here we carried out the assay with the sub-endothelial protein laminin. The machine learning approach segmented the resulting channel images with 99.1±0.3% mean IoU on the validation set across 5 k-folds, classified detected sRBCs with 96.0±0.3% mean accuracy on the validation set across 5 k-folds, and matched trained personnel in overall characterization of whole channel images with R2 = 0.992, 0.987 and 0.834 for total, deformable and non-deformable sRBC counts respectively. Average analysis time per channel image was also improved by two orders of magnitude (∼ 2 minutes vs ∼ 2-3 hours) over manual characterization. Finally, the network results show an order of magnitude less variance in counts on repeat trials than humans. This kind of standardization is a prerequisite for the viability of any diagnostic technology, making our system suitable for affordable and high throughput disease monitoring.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnemia, Sickle CellBiophysical PhenomenaComputational BiologyDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedErythrocyte DeformabilityErythrocytes, AbnormalHemoglobin, SickleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIn Vitro TechniquesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesLamininMicrofluidicsNeural Networks, ComputerHemoglobin, SickleLaminin

Identifiers

PMID34843453
PMCPMC8659663
OpenAlexW3214944438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.