Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843294›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2021

Applying hierarchical bayesian modeling to experimental psychopathology data: An introduction and tutorial.

Ivy F Tso, Stephan F Taylor, Timothy D Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivy F TsoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0002-0984-1186
Stephan F TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0001-8777-4292
Timothy D JohnsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0002-7676-5347

Funding

Disrupted eye gaze perception as a biobehavioral marker of social dysfunction: An RDoC investigationR01MH122491 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TSO, IVY FEI · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
Neural mechanisms of eye gaze perception in schizophreniaK23MH108823 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TSO, IVY FEI · 2016 to 2020
$894k
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Psychosis Risk SyndromeR21MH101676 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TAYLOR, STEPHAN F · 2013 to 2014
$428k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108823NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122491NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH101676University of Michigan Depression Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades Bayesian methods have been gaining popularity in many scientific disciplines. However, to this date, they are rarely part of formal graduate statistical training in clinical science. Although Bayesian methods can be an attractive alternative to classical methods for answering certain research questions, they involve a heavy "overhead" (e.g., advanced mathematical methods, complex computations), which pose significant barriers to researchers interested in adding Bayesian methods to their statistical toolbox. To increase the accessibility of Bayesian methods for psychopathology researchers, this article presents a gentle introduction of the Bayesian inference framework and a tutorial on implementation. We first provide a primer on the key concepts of Bayesian inference and major implementation considerations related to Bayesian estimation. We then demonstrate how to apply hierarchical Bayesian modeling (HBM) to experimental psychopathology data. Using a real dataset collected from two clinical groups (schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) and a healthy comparison sample on a psychophysical gaze perception task, we illustrate how to model individual responses and group differences with probability functions respectful of the presumed underlying data-generating process and the hierarchical nature of the data. We provide the code with explanations and the data used to generate and visualize the results to facilitate learning. Finally, we discuss interpretation of the results in terms of posterior probabilities and compare the results with those obtained using a traditional method. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychopathologyBayes TheoremHumansLikelihood FunctionsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID34843294
PMCPMC8634778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.