Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843172›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2022

Responses to balance challenges in persons with panic disorder: A pilot study of computerized static and dynamic balance measurements.

Revital Amiaz, Shani Kimel Naor, Asaf Caspi, Efrat Czerniak, Shlomo Noy, Tatiana Pelc, Matti Mintz, Meir Plotnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Revital AmiazPsychiatry Department, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-4625
Shani Kimel NaorThe Center of Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Asaf CaspiPsychiatry Department, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Efrat CzerniakPsychiatry Department, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Shlomo NoyPsychiatry Department, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Tatiana PelcSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Matti MintzSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Meir PlotnikThe Center of Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-3457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral studies have shown an association between panic disorder (PD) and reduced balance abilities, mainly based on functional balance scales. This pilot study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of studying balance abilities of persons with PD (PwPD) using computerized static and, for the first time, dynamic balance measurements in order to characterize balance control strategies employed by PwPD.

methodsTwelve PwPD and 11 healthy controls were recruited. PD diagnosis was confirmed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), and the severity of symptoms was evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), PD Severity Scales (PDSS), and Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS). Balance was clinically assessed using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and physically by the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest). Dizziness was evaluated using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scale. Postural control was evaluated statically by measuring body sway and dynamically by measuring body responses to rapid unexpected physical perturbations.

resultsPwPD had higher scores on the HAM-A (17.6 ± 10.3 vs. 3.0 ± 2.9; p < .001), PDSS (11.3 ± 5.1 vs. 0; p < .001), and PAS (20.3 ± 8.7 vs. 0; p < .001) questionnaires and lower scores on the balance scales compared to the controls (ABC scale: 156.2 ± 5.9 vs. 160 ± 0.0, p = .016; Mini-BESTest: 29.4 ± 2.1 vs. 31.4 ± 0.9, p = .014; DHI: 5.3 ± 4.4 vs. 0.09 ± 0.3, p < .001). In the static balance tests, PwPD showed a not-significantly smaller ellipse area of center of pressure trajectory (p = .36) and higher body sway velocity (p = .46), whereas in the dynamic balance tests, PwPD had shorter recovery time from physical perturbations in comparison to controls (2.1 ± 1.2s vs. 1.6 ± 0.9 s, p = .018).

conclusionThe computerized balance tests results point to an adoption of a ''postural rigidity'' strategy by the PwPD, that is, reduced dynamic adaptations in the face of postural challenges. This may reflect a nonsecure compensatory behavior. Further research is needed to delineate this strategy.

Indexed as

Panic DisorderAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgoraphobiaHumansPilot ProjectsPostural Balancedynamic balancepanic disorderperturbationsstatic balancesway

Identifiers

PMID34843172
PMCPMC8785611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.