Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34843099›Full record

SynthesisAmbio2022

Transformative low-carbon urban innovations: Operationalizing transformative capacity for urban planning.

Fatemeh Shahani, Melissa Pineda-Pinto, Niki Frantzeskaki

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatemeh ShahaniCentre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia. fshahani@swin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-6378
Melissa Pineda-PintoCentre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-0569
Niki FrantzeskakiCentre for Urban Transitions, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6983-448X

Funding

CRC for Low Carbon Living 3012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cities can set in motion sustainability transitions through experimentation and innovation. To invest in and mainstream solutions that contribute to urban transformation agendas, urban planners needs to understand which innovations have transformational potential as well as how these innovations can accelerate sustainability transitions. In order to explore this, existing frameworks of transformative capacity provide the guidance, but they are generic, abstract, and challenging to apply for urban planning. As part of our effort to develop a more operational version of the transformative capacity framework by Wolfram (2016), we conducted a systematic scoping review of the academic literature to determine the characteristics of people-based and nature-based low-carbon innovations that constitutes their transformative capacity. After reviewing 65 records, we identified dimensions indicating each of the transformative capacity components through analysis and synthesis. Besides contributing to the science-policy interface through a knowledge synthesis on low-carbon people-based and nature-based innovations, this paper examines bridging frameworks to inform urban planners in developing practical solutions and actionable elements for low-carbon urban futures.

Indexed as

CarbonCity PlanningCitiesHumansKnowledgeCarbonCitiesLow-carbonNature-based solutionsSocial–ecological innovationTransformative capacityUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID34843099
PMCPMC8931143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.