Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842993›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Clinical applications of concentrated growth factors combined with bone substitutes for alveolar ridge preservation in maxillary molar area: a randomized controlled trial.

Shi-Chen Lin, Xin Li, Hang Liu, Fang Wu, Lian Yang, Ya Su, Jun Li, Shao-Yu Duan

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shi-Chen Lin *Department of Stomatology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China.
Xin Li *Department of Stomatology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China.
Hang LiuDepartment of Stomatology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China.
Fang WuDepartment of Pathology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China.
Lian YangDepartment of Stomatology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China.
Ya SuDepartment of Stomatology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.4 Tiantan Xili, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. kunkun-000@163.com.
Shao-Yu DuanDepartment of Stomatology, Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1, Taipingqiao Xili, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100073, China. dsy1@sohu.com.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical effects of concentrated growth factors (CGFs) combined with bone substitutes for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the maxillary molar area.

methodsThirty-six patients who underwent extraction of the upper molars were recruited and randomly divided into three groups: 1. Grafted with CGFs combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and covered with CGFs membrane (CGFs/DBBM group), 2. Grafted with DBBM alone and covered with collagen membrane (DBBM group), 3. Control group spontaneous healing. The area of the alveolar bone in center (C-), mesial (M-) and distal (D-) section was compared with preoperative in radiography. Bone cores were obtained for histopathology observation and comparison.

resultsIn C-, M- and D-section, the alveolar ridge area in all three groups was significantly reduced at 8 months postoperatively compared to the baseline (P < 0.05). The alveolar ridge area declines in the CGFs/DBBM group (C-12.75 ± 2.22 mm

conclusionCombined application of CGFs and DBBM effectively reduced the resorption of alveolar ridge and resulted in more newly formed bone than the use of DBBM with collagen membranes.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossAlveolar Ridge AugmentationBone SubstitutesAlveolar ProcessAnimalsCattleHumansMolarTooth ExtractionTooth SocketBone SubstitutesAlveolar ridge preservationCGFsDBBMHistologyRadiography

Identifiers

PMID34842993
PMCPMC8630354
OpenAlexW3217055439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.