Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842658›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2021

Neuroarchitecture Assessment: An Overview and Bibliometric Analysis.

Hessam Ghamari, Nasrin Golshany, Parastou Naghibi Rad, Farzaneh Behzadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bibliometric Analysis of the Toxicity of Bisphenol A.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  2. Cognition in Climate Change: Is It Just a Matter of Time?Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hessam GhamariInterior Design Program, Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, College of Health and Human Development, California State University Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-1969
Nasrin GolshanyDepartment of Architecture, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7545-2042
Parastou Naghibi RadInstitute of Medical Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Tehran 19839 69411, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-4407
Farzaneh BehzadiSchool of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran 13114 16846, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1572-9331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on the relationship between architecture and neuroscience has increased in number and significance since the 1990s. Although a growing number of studies revolve around this field of research, there are very limited studies that have reviewed and assessed the field and there is a gap in the literature to address the overall analysis of neuroarchitecture literature and its evolution. Additionally, neuroarchitecture literature is now challenging to manage because of its multidisciplinary scope and wide range spread within different themes and journals. The primary aim of this study is to present a bibliometric analysis of three decades of research on neuroarchitecture. This provides an overall picture of the field and its research landscape. Two hundred and ninety-five publications were included in the final database of the study after screening processes. Next, a science mapping tool, VOSviewer, was utilized to detect major topics as well as influential authors, countries, publications, and prominent journals using different network analysis techniques such as term co-citation, term co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling. Next, a similar co-occurrence analysis was conducted to identify the major themes and the evolution of the intellectual basis of the field. SciMAT was also used to detect how the intellectual base of the knowledge in the field has evolved over time. It also assisted to identify the major themes that have contributed to this evolution. The results show that this field has initially been mainly focused on few themes but has later become more diversified to acknowledge the multi-faceted characteristics of neuroarchitecture; over time, the intellectual base of the field of neuroarchitecture started to grow, particularly from 2016. Major progress in the development of theoretical and methodological approaches has been achieved and there has been a paradigm shift toward major keywords in neuroarchitecture such as EEG, fMRI, and virtual reality.

Indexed as

architecturebibliometric analysisenvironmental designneuroarchitectureneuroscienceVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID34842658
PMCPMC8628715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.