Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842628›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Review on Development of Bio-Inspired Implants Using 3D Printing.

Ansheed A Raheem, Pearlin Hameed, Ruban Whenish, Renold S Elsen, Aswin G, Amit Kumar Jaiswal, Konda Gokuldoss Prashanth, Geetha Manivasagam

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interpenetrating Composites: A Nomenclature Dilemma.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Functionally graded 3D printed plates for rib fracture fixation.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ansheed A RaheemCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Pearlin HameedCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Ruban WhenishCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8461-6413
Renold S ElsenSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Aswin GSchool of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Amit Kumar JaiswalCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6566-3580
Konda Gokuldoss PrashanthCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5644-2527
Geetha ManivasagamCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Vellore Institute of Technology University · INTallinn University of Technology · EE

Funding

Council of Industrial and Scientific Research, Government of India No.22(0803)/19/EMR IIEuropean Regional Development Grant ASTRA6-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomimetics is an emerging field of science that adapts the working principles from nature to fine-tune the engineering design aspects to mimic biological structure and functions. The application mainly focuses on the development of medical implants for hard and soft tissue replacements. Additive manufacturing or 3D printing is an established processing norm with a superior resolution and control over process parameters than conventional methods and has allowed the incessant amalgamation of biomimetics into material manufacturing, thereby improving the adaptation of biomaterials and implants into the human body. The conventional manufacturing practices had design restrictions that prevented mimicking the natural architecture of human tissues into material manufacturing. However, with additive manufacturing, the material construction happens layer-by-layer over multiple axes simultaneously, thus enabling finer control over material placement, thereby overcoming the design challenge that prevented developing complex human architectures. This review substantiates the dexterity of additive manufacturing in utilizing biomimetics to 3D print ceramic, polymer, and metal implants with excellent resemblance to natural tissue. It also cites some clinical references of experimental and commercial approaches employing biomimetic 3D printing of implants.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingbiomimeticceramicsmetalspolymer

Identifiers

PMID34842628
PMCPMC8628669
OpenAlexW3216176396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.