Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842613›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2021

Family Perceptions of Newborn Cytomegalovirus Screening: A Qualitative Study.

Michael J Cannon, Denise M Levis, Holly McBride, Danie Watson, Carol Rheaume, Mary Ann Kirkconnell Hall, Tatiana M Lanzieri, Gail Demmler-Harrison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J CannonNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Denise M LevisNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Holly McBrideDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Danie WatsonKirby Marketing Solutions, Tampa, FL 33609, USA.
Carol RheaumeKirby Marketing Solutions, Tampa, FL 33609, USA.
Mary Ann Kirkconnell HallEagle Global Scientific for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4188-4768
Tatiana M LanzieriNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Gail Demmler-HarrisonDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

CDC HHS FOA IP 10-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to understand long-term retrospective parental perceptions of the utility of newborn screening in a context where many affected children never develop sequelae but where intensive support services and ongoing healthcare were provided. STUDY

designQualitative study.

methodsFocus groups and interviews among parents (N = 41) of children with congenital CMV who had been enrolled in a long-term follow-up study at a large medical college for a mean of 22 years following diagnosis. Groups included parents whose children were: symptomatic at birth; initially asymptomatic but later developed sensorineural hearing loss; and who remained asymptomatic into adulthood.

resultsWith proper follow-up support, newborn CMV screening was viewed positively by parents, who felt empowered by the knowledge, though parents often felt that they and healthcare providers needed more information on congenital CMV. Parents in all groups valued newborn CMV screening in the long term and believed it should be embedded within a comprehensive follow-up program.

conclusionsDespite initial distress, parents of CMV-positive children felt newborn CMV screening was a net positive. Mandatory or opt-out screening for conditions with variable presentations and treatment outcomes may be valuable in contexts where follow-up and care are readily available.

Indexed as

congenital cytomegalovirusnewborn screeningparental perceptionsqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID34842613
PMCPMC8629002
OpenAlexW3215018012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.