Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842557›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Using Methods From Computational Decision-making to Predict Nonadherence to Fitness Goals: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Marie McCarthy, Lili Zhang, Greta Monacelli, Tomas Ward

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04783298 (Can Methods From Computational Psychology be Used to Phenotype Individuals Most Likely to be Non-adherent to Fitness Goals?), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04783298 unknown statusnot on this map

Can Methods From Computational Psychology be Used to Phenotype Individuals Most Likely to be Non-adherent to Fitness Goals?

TypeobservationalSponsorDublin City UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled200ConditionsLifestyle, SedentaryArmsApp
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie McCarthyInsight Centre For Data Analytics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2730-0233
Lili ZhangInsight Centre For Data Analytics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-2949
Greta MonacelliInsight Centre For Data Analytics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4677-4661
Tomas WardInsight Centre For Data Analytics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-6607
Dublin City University · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCan methods from computational models of decision-making be used to build a predictive model to identify individuals most likely to be nonadherent to personal fitness goals? Such a model may have significant value in the global battle against obesity. Despite growing awareness of the impact of physical inactivity on human health, sedentary behavior is increasingly linked to premature death in the developed world. The annual impact of sedentary behavior is significant, causing an estimated 2 million deaths. From a global perspective, sedentary behavior is one of the 10 leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Annually, considerable funding and countless public health initiatives are applied to promote physical fitness, with little impact on sustained behavioral change. Predictive models developed from multimodal methodologies combining data from decision-making tasks with contextual insights and objective physical activity data could be used to identify those most likely to abandon their fitness goals. This has the potential to enable development of more targeted support to ensure that those who embark on fitness programs are successful.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine whether it is possible to use decision-making tasks such as the Iowa Gambling Task to help determine those most likely to abandon their fitness goals. Predictive models built using methods from computational models of decision-making, combining objective data from a fitness tracker with personality traits and modeling from decision-making games delivered via a mobile app, will be used to ascertain whether a predictive algorithm can identify digital personae most likely to be nonadherent to self-determined exercise goals. If it is possible to phenotype these individuals, it may be possible to tailor initiatives to support these individuals to continue exercising.

methodsThis is a siteless study design based on a bring your own device model. A total of 200 healthy adults who are novice exercisers and own a Fitbit (Fitbit Inc) physical activity tracker will be recruited via social media for this study. Participants will provide consent via the study app, which they will download from the Google Play store (Alphabet Inc) or Apple App Store (Apple Inc). They will also provide consent to share their Fitbit data. Necessary demographic information concerning age and sex will be collected as part of the recruitment process. Over 12 months, the scheduled study assessments will be pushed to the subjects to complete. The Iowa Gambling Task will be administered via a web app shared via a URL.

resultsEthics approval was received from Dublin City University in December 2020. At manuscript submission, study recruitment was pending. The expected results will be published in 2022.

conclusionsIt is hoped that the study results will support the development of a predictive model and the study design will inform future research approaches.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04783298; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04783298.

Indexed as

advanced analyticscomputational modelingcomputational psychologydecision-making gamesfitness goalsfitness trackermobile appmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID34842557
PMCPMC8665389
OpenAlexW3215276542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.