Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842526›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Patients' Use of Mobile Health for Self-management of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results of a 6-Week Pilot Study.

Brittany Shewchuk, Lee A Green, Tanya Barber, Jean Miller, Sylvia Teare, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Kelly J Mrklas, Linda C Li, Nancy Marlett, Tracy Wasylak and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Usability Assessment of Technologies for Remote Monitoring of Knee Osteoarthritis.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany ShewchukDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-9521
Lee A GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-7366
Tanya BarberEnhancing Alberta Primary Care Research Networks, Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-2354
Jean MillerO'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-1261
Sylvia TeareO'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-2645
Denise Campbell-SchererDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-8207
Kelly J MrklasDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3887-1843
Linda C LiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-0511
Nancy MarlettPatient and Community Engagement Research Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-1894
Tracy WasylakStrategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-7523
Elena LopatinaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8233-587X
Deirdre McCaugheyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-0907
Deborah A MarshallDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-8008
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a previous study, a prototype mobile health (mHealth) app was co-designed with patients, family physicians, and researchers to enhance self-management and optimize conservative management for patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA).

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the overall usability, quality, and effectiveness of the mHealth app prototype for aiding knee OA self-management from the perspectives of patients with OA and health care providers (HCPs).

methodsUsing methods triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data, we conducted a pilot evaluation of an mHealth app prototype that was codeveloped with patients and HCPs. We recruited adult patients aged ≥20 years with early knee OA (n=18) who experienced knee pain on most days of the month at any time in the past and HCPs (n=7) to participate. In the qualitative assessment, patient and HCP perspectives were elicited on the likeability and usefulness of app features and functionalities and the perceived impact of the app on patient-HCP communication. The quantitative assessment involved evaluating the app using usability, quality, and effectiveness metrics. Patient baseline assessments included a semistructured interview and survey to gather demographics and assess the quality of life (European Quality-of-Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L]) and patient activation (patient activation measure [PAM]). Following the 6-week usability trial period, a follow-up survey assessed patients' perceptions of app usability and quality and longitudinal changes in quality of life and patient activation. Semistructured interviews and surveys were also conducted with HCPs (n=7) at baseline to evaluate the usability and quality of the app prototype.

resultsInterviews with patients and HCPs revealed overall positive impressions of the app prototype features and functionalities related to likeability and usefulness. Between the baseline and follow-up patient assessments, the mean EQ-5D-5L scores improved from 0.77 to 0.67 (P=.04), and PAM scores increased from 80.4 to 87.9 (P=.01). Following the 6-week evaluation, patients reported a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 57.8, indicating marginal acceptability according to SUS cutoffs. The mean number of goals set during the usability period was 2.47 (SD 3.08), and the mean number of activities completed for knee OA self-management during the study period was 22.2 (SD 17.8). Spearman rank correlation (r

conclusionsThis evidence-based and patient-centered app prototype represents a potential use of mHealth for improving outcomes and enhancing conservative care by promoting patient activation and patient-HCP communication regarding OA management. However, future iterations of the app prototype are required to address the limitations related to usability and quality.

Indexed as

appmHealthmobile healthosteoarthritisself-management

Identifiers

PMID34842526
PMCPMC8663438
OpenAlexW3207657071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.