Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842478›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2022

Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Natalie H Strand, Adam R Burkey

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06524284 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of Self-treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Using Electrical Vasomotor Nerve Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeurecon BVRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsPainful Diabetic NeuropathyArmsReleaf
NCT07619794 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Combined Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) and Augmented Reality (AR) Training on Pain and Balance in Diabetic Neuropathy Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled36ConditionsDiabetic NeuropathiesArmstranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Augmented Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: The Need for New Approaches.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie H StrandDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Adam R BurkeyChair of Pain Section, American Academy of Neurology, Minneapolis, MI, USA.
American Academy of Neurology · USMayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuropathies, the most common complication of diabetes, manifest in various forms, including entrapments, mononeuropathies or, most frequently, a distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in the classic "stocking" distribution is a disease of increasing prevalence worldwide and a condition for which standard medical treatment only provides modest relief. Neuromodulation offers a potential alternative to pharmacotherapies given its demonstrated efficacy in other refractory chronic neuropathic pain syndromes. High-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is available in these other settings for two approaches to spinal cord stimulation (SCS): (1) conventional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS), which modulates axonal activity in the dorsal column and is paresthesia-dependent, and (2) high-frequency SCS delivered at 10 kilohertz (10 kHz SCS), which targets neurons in the superficial dorsal horn and is paresthesia-independent.

methodThis review examines the evidence for SCS from published RCTs as well as prospective studies exploring the safety and effectiveness of treating PDN with neuromodulation.

resultsTwo RCTs enrolling 60 and 36 participants with PDN showed treatment with LF-SCS reduced daytime pain by 45% to 55% for up to two years. An RCT testing 10 kHz SCS versus conventional medical management (CMM) in 216 participants with PDN revealed 76% mean pain relief after six months of stimulation. None of the studies revealed unexpected safety issues in the use of neuromodulation in this patient population.

conclusionThese well-designed RCTs address the unmet need for improved PDN therapies and provide data on the safety, effectiveness, and durability of SCS therapy.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic NeuropathiesSpinal Cord StimulationHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome10 kHz SCSdiabetesdiabetic peripheral neuropathyneuromodulationneuropathic painpainful diabetic neuropathyspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34842478
PMCPMC8861784
OpenAlexW3215504557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.