Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842413›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021

An Introduction to the Benchmarking and Publications for Non-Targeted Analysis Working Group.

Benjamin J Place, Elin M Ulrich, Jonathan K Challis, Alex Chao, Bowen Du, Kristin Favela, Yong-Lai Feng, Christine M Fisher, Piero Gardinali, Alan Hood and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Modular, Scalable, and Customizable LC-HRMS for Exposomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Benjamin J PlaceNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-5215
Elin M UlrichU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-9449
Jonathan K ChallisToxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 5B3.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-0647
Alex ChaoU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Bowen DuSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, Costa Mesa, California 92626, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3910-825X
Kristin FavelaSouthwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-8316
Yong-Lai FengExposure and Biomonitoring Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9.
Christine M FisherU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States.
Piero GardinaliInstitute of Environment & Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida 33181, United States.
Alan HoodU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Ann M KnolhoffU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9733-7640
Andrew D McEachranAgilent Technologies, Inc. Santa Clara, California 95051, United States.
Sara L NasonConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3866-6399
Seth R NewtonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-0107
Brian NgInstitute of Environment & Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida 33181, United States.
Jamie NuñezPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Katherine T PeterNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Charleston, South Carolina 29412, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7379-265X
Allison L PhillipsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Natalia QuineteInstitute of Environment & Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida 33181, United States.
Ryan RenslowPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3969-5570
Jon R SobusU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Eric M SussmanU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-7876
Benedikt WarthDepartment of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-0706
Samanthi WickramasekaraU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Antony J WilliamsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-targeted analysis (NTA) encompasses a rapidly evolving set of mass spectrometry techniques aimed at characterizing the chemical composition of complex samples, identifying unknown compounds, and/or classifying samples, without prior knowledge regarding the chemical content of the samples. Recent advances in NTA are the result of improved and more accessible instrumentation for data generation and analysis tools for data evaluation and interpretation. As researchers continue to develop NTA approaches in various scientific fields, there is a growing need to identify, disseminate, and adopt community-wide method reporting guidelines. In 2018, NTA researchers formed the Benchmarking and Publications for Non-Targeted Analysis Working Group (BP4NTA) to address this need. Consisting of participants from around the world and representing fields ranging from environmental science and food chemistry to 'omics and toxicology, BP4NTA provides resources addressing a variety of challenges associated with NTA. Thus far, BP4NTA group members have aimed to establish a consensus on NTA-related terms and concepts and to create consistency in reporting practices by providing resources on a public Web site, including consensus definitions, reference content, and lists of available tools. Moving forward, BP4NTA will provide a setting for NTA researchers to continue discussing emerging challenges and contribute to additional harmonization efforts.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingHumans

Identifiers

PMID34842413
PMCPMC8848292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.