Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842335›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Topic modeling of maintenance logs for linac failure modes and trends identification.

Hongguang Yun, Marco Carlone, Zheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongguang YunFaculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Marco CarloneDepartment of Medical Physics, BC Cancer Kelowna, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Zheng LiuFaculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical linear accelerators (linacs) can fail in a multitude of different manners due to complex structures. An unclear identification of failure modes occurring constantly is a major obstacle to maintenance arrangements, thereby may increasing downtime. This study aims to use natural language processing techniques to deal with the unformatted maintenance logs to identify the linac failure modes and trends over time. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe data used in our study are unformatted narrative maintenance logs recording linac conditions and repair actions. The latent Dirichlet allocation-based topic modeling method was used to identify topics and keywords regarding the failure modes. The temporal analysis method was applied to examine the variation of failure modes over 20 years.

resultsBased on the output of the topic modeling, 28 topics and keywords with frequency ranking were generated automatically. The latent failure modes in topics were identified and classified into six main subsystems of linacs. Furthermore, by using the temporal analysis method, the trends of all failure modes over 20 years were illustrated. Half of the topics demonstrated variations with three different patterns, namely periodic, increasing, and decreasing.

conclusionsThe results of our study validated the effectiveness of using the topic modeling method to automatically analyze narrative maintenance logs. With domain knowledge, failure modes of linacs can be identified and categorized quantitatively.

Indexed as

Particle AcceleratorsResearch DesignHumansfailure modeslatent Dirichlet allocationlinacnatural language processingtopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID34842335
PMCPMC8803305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.