Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34842130›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2022

A multi-level, multi-component obesity intervention (Obesity Prevention and Evaluation of InterVention Effectiveness in NaTive North Americans) decreases soda intake in Native American adults.

Leslie C Redmond, Brittany Jock, Fariba Kolahdooz, Sangita Sharma, Marla Pardilla, Jacqueline Swartz, Laura E Caulfield, Joel Gittelsohn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Leslie C RedmondDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, School of Allied Health, College of Health, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr., PSB 146H, Anchorage, AK99508, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7924-630X
Brittany JockMcGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Fariba KolahdoozDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sangita SharmaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Marla PardillaDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jacqueline SwartzDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laura E CaulfieldDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-1004
Joel GittelsohnDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of Alaska Anchorage · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a multi-level, multi-component (MLMC) adult obesity intervention on beverage intake in Native American adults living in five geographically and culturally diverse tribal communities.

designA 14-month, community-randomised, MLMC design was utilised, with three communities randomised to Intervention and two communities randomised to Comparison. FFQ were administered pre- and post-interventions, and difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis was used to assess intervention impact on beverage intake.

settingThe intervention took place within food stores, worksites, schools and selected media outlets located in the five communities. Key activities included working with store owners to stock healthy beverages, display and dispersal of educational materials, support of policies that discouraged unhealthy beverage consumption at worksites and schools and taste tests.

participantsData were collected from 422 respondents between the ages of 18 and 75 living in the five communities pre-intervention; of those, 299 completed post-intervention surveys. Only respondents completing both pre- and post-intervention surveys were included in the current analysis.

resultsThe DiD for daily servings of regular, sugar-sweetened soda from pre- to post-intervention was significant, indicating a significant decrease in Intervention communities (P < 0·05). No other changes to beverage intake were observed.

conclusionsLarge, MLMC obesity interventions can successfully reduce the intake of regular, sugar-sweetened soda in Native American adults. This is important within modern food environments where sugar-sweetened beverages are a primary source of added sugars in Native American diets.

Indexed as

InterventionNative AmericanNutritionObesitySugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID34842130
PMCPMC9991660
OpenAlexW3216485761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.