ArticleCurrent eye research2022
An Improved Ocular Impression Cytology Method: Quantitative Cell Transfer to Microscope Slides Using a Novel Polymer.
Article in Current eye research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a more efficient impression cytology (IC) method for the transfer of ocular surface cells onto glass microscope slides for cytochemical, immunocytochemical, and immunofluorescence studies.
methodsCells are lifted off the ocular surface with a mixed cellulose ester membrane and then firmly attached to a glass slide using a novel triblock copolymer comprised of collagen type I, polyethylenimine and poly-L-lysine (CPP), and crosslinking cells and glass slide by heating and cooling. The membrane is removed intact after softening it with a butanol/ethanol solution. Transfer of cells is complete in about 10-15 minutes and is ready for staining. The efficiency of our cell transfer method was compared to current methods based on poly-L-lysine and albumin paste.
resultsOur method ensured almost complete transfer of cells. In contrast, the transfer of rabbit conjunctiva cells onto poly-L-lysine-covered slides was 37.5 ± 6.3% lower, and onto albumin-paste covered slides 62.5 ± 5.6% lower (mean ± SD); the transfer of rabbit goblet cells was even less efficient. The new method was also more efficient for transfer of cells from human oral mucosa obtained by IC. Transferred cells were successfully stained with H&E, chemiluminescence, and immunofluorescence agents. Using our method, we stained ocular surface cells for S100A4 and ATF4, both of which play a role in the pathophysiology of dry eye disease. We obtained similar results with oral mucosal cells, suggesting the generalizability of our approach. We propose an explanation for the strong adhesion of cells to the glass slide, which is based on their interactions with the triblock copolymer.
conclusionsWe developed a novel approach for the efficient and rapid transfer of cells obtained by IC onto glass microscope slides using a novel copolymer. Compared to available methods, our improved approach makes IC robust and simple, and should increase its diagnostic yield and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.