Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841644›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2022

Predictors for psychological distress of young burn survivors across three years: A cohort study of a burn disaster in Taiwan.

Lu-Yen Anny Chen, Chia-Yi Wu, Ming-Been Lee, Chi-Hung Lin, Shu-Chen Kao, Chung-Chieh Tu, Ran-Chou Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Predictors for psychological distress of young burn survivors across three years: A cohort study of a burn disaster in Taiwan.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu-Yen Anny ChenInstitute of Clinical Nursing, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6223-3748
Chia-Yi WuSchool of Nursing, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1756-557X
Ming-Been LeeTaiwanese Society of Suicidology & Taiwan Suicide Prevention Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Hung LinDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Chen KaoDepartment of Health, New Taipei City Government, Banqiao, Taiwan.
Chung-Chieh TuDepartment of Health, New Taipei City Government, Banqiao, Taiwan.
Ran-Chou ChenDepartment of Health, New Taipei City Government, Banqiao, Taiwan.
Taipei City Government · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTaiwan Society of Cardiology · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aims to investigate long-term psychological distress and its risk factors in the burn survivors.

designA longitudinal study with follow-up interviews was conducted from November 2015-June 2018. A post-burn baseline interview was conducted 6 months after the event, followed by annual surveys for three years.

methodsThe burn survivors received structured assessment through telephone in the four-wave interviews, including the five-item Brief Symptom Rating Scale (BSRS-5); two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2); four-item Startle, Physiological Arousal, Anger, and Numbness Scale (SPAN-4); and six-item Impact of Event Scale (IES-6) alongside demographic data and other health-related assessment.

findingsA total of 180 respondents with the mean age of 23 years old completed the four waves of interview. Using the BSRS-5 as the outcome, each variable had different input in psychological distress during the follow-up years. The main finding was that the SPAN-4 score could predict more than 62% of psychological distress between 6 months and 3 years after the disaster. The generalized estimating equation demonstrated that SPAN-4, IES-6, family functioning impairment, hypnotics use, adaptation to the event, and PHQ-2 could predict psychological distress. However, the variable of follow-up year did not exemplify significant estimation in the model.

conclusionsThe results indicated that different factors had various influences on psychological distress across the four follow-up stages. PTSD-like symptoms, depression, and anxiety were the most common psychological problems experienced by the young burn cohort in the longitudinal post-traumatic period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Healthcare providers should be aware of psychological consequences of traumatic events within up to a 3-year post-burn period, particularly post-traumatic stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms.

Indexed as

DisastersPsychological DistressStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdultCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesStress, PsychologicalSurvivorsTaiwanYoung Adultanxietyburn disasterslongitudinal studypsychological distressTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID34841644
PMCPMC9299193
OpenAlexW3215091564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.