Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841595›Full record

ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2022

MammaPrint and BluePrint comprehensively capture the cancer hallmarks in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Josien C Haan, Rajith Bhaskaran, Architha Ellappalayam, Yannick Bijl, Christian J Griffioen, Ersan Lujinovic, William M Audeh, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Lorenza Mittempergher, Annuska M Glas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding and targeting the tumour matrisome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josien C HaanDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-6323
Rajith BhaskaranDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Architha EllappalayamDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yannick BijlDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian J GriffioenDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ersan LujinovicMedical Affairs, Agendia Inc., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
William M AudehMedical Affairs, Agendia Inc., Irvine, USA.
Frédérique Penault-LlorcaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Lorenza MittempergherDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annuska M GlasDepartment of Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agendia (Netherlands) · NLInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MammaPrint® (MP) is a 70-gene signature that stratifies early-stage breast cancer patients into low- and high risk of distant relapse. Further stratification of MP risk results identifies four risk subgroups, ultra-low (UL), low, high 1, and high 2, with specific prognostic and predictive outcomes. BluePrint® (BP) is an 80-gene signature that classifies breast tumors as basal, luminal, or HER2 molecular subtype. To gain insight into their biological significance, we annotated the MP 70- and BP 80-genes with respect to the 10 hallmarks of cancer (HoC). Furthermore, we related gene expression profiles of the extreme ends of the MP low- and high-risk patients (here called, ultra-low (UL) and ultra-high (UH) or High2, respectively), to the 10 HoC per BP subtype by differential gene expression and pathway analysis. MP and BP gene functions reflected all 10 HoCs. Most MP and BP genes were associated with sustaining proliferative signaling, followed by genome instability and mutation categories. Based on the gene expression profiles, UL and UH subgroup pathways were down -or upregulated, respectively, reflecting proliferative and metastatic features, such as G2M checkpoint, DNA repair, oxidative phosphorylation, immune invasion, PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling, and hypoxia pathways. Notably, the UH HER2-type was enriched in several immune signaling pathways, such as IL2/STAT5 signaling and TNFα signaling via NFκB. Our results show that MP and BP gene signatures represent and capture all 10 HoCs and highlight underlying biological processes of MP extreme samples, which might guide treatment decisions as the signature captures the full spectrum of early breast cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrognosisSignal TransductionTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorBluePrint 80-gene signatureearly breast cancergene expression profileshallmarks of cancerhigh/low riskMammaPrint 70-gene signature

Identifiers

PMID34841595
PMCPMC9299843
OpenAlexW3217432755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.