ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Multiple forecasting approach: a prediction of CO2 emission from the paddy crop in India.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MLP Enhanced COScientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper compares four prediction methods, namely random forest regressor (RFR), SARIMAX, Holt-Winters (H-W), and the support vector regression (SVR), to forecast the total CO2 emission from the paddy crop in India. The major objective of this study is to compare these four models and suggest an effective model for the prediction of total CO2 emission. Data from 1961 to 2018 has been categorised into two parts: training and test data. The study forecasts total CO2 emission from paddy crops in India from 2019 to 2025. A comparison of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and the mean square error (MSE) highlights the differences in accuracy among the four models. The mean absolute percentage eror (MAPE) and the mean square error (MSE) for the four methods are RFR (MAPE: 5.67; MSE: 549,900.02), SARIMAX (MAPE: 1.67; MSE:70,422.35), H-W (MAPE:0.75; MSE:16,648.58), and SVR (MAPE: 0.91; MSE: 17,832.4). The values of MAPE and MSE with the Holt-Winters (H-W) and the support vector regression (SVR) are relatively low as compared to SARIMAX and RFR. Based on these results, it can be inferred that H-W and SVR were found suitable models to forecast the total CO2 emission from paddy crops. Holt-Winters model predicted 14,364.97 for the year 2025, and SVR predicted 13,696.67 for the year 2025. The decision-maker can use these predictions to build a suitable policy for the future. This approach can be contrasted with other forecasting methods, such as the neural network, and train the model to achieve better forecast accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34841483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.