Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841358›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2021

Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from organically grown high yielding pole type native pea (

Mingma Thundu Sherpa, Niladri Bag, Sayak Das, Paolenmang Haokip, Laxuman Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Stress-TolerantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of TwoPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plant-AssociatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Plant Growth Promotion UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Exploring the Plant Growth-Promotion of FourPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mingma Thundu SherpaDepartment of Horticulture, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Gangtok, Sikkim 737102, India.
Niladri BagDepartment of Horticulture, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Gangtok, Sikkim 737102, India.
Sayak DasDepartment of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Gangtok, Sikkim 737102, India.
Paolenmang HaokipDepartment of Geology, School of Physical Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Gangtok, Sikkim 737102, India.
Laxuman SharmaDepartment of Horticulture, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Gangtok, Sikkim 737102, India.
Sikkim University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic farming is an eco-friendly and sustainable farming practice that enhances soil fertility and helps in improving soil quality. But with the commencement of more sophisticated advances in agricultural techniques, organic farming has gradually become limited in the world. Culture-dependent plant growth-promoting bacterial isolates were isolated from the bulk and rhizospheric soil, of the native high yielding pole type organic pea (

Indexed as

Bacterial diversityBulk soilCulture-dependentOrganicPeaRhizosphere

Identifiers

PMID34841358
PMCPMC8610319
OpenAlexW3199289599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.