Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841352›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in microbial sciences2021

Tools and challenges to exploit microbial communities in agriculture.

Lorena Jacqueline Gómez-Godínez, Esperanza Martínez-Romero, Jacob Banuelos, Ramón I Arteaga-Garibay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in microbial sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Look at Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorena Jacqueline Gómez-GodínezLaboratorio de Recursos Genéticos Microbianos, Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarios. Boulevard de la Biodiversidad 400, Rancho las Cruces, C.P. 47600. Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México.
Esperanza Martínez-RomeroCentro de Ciencias genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Campus Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos México.
Jacob BanuelosLaboratorio de Organismos Benéficos, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Veracruzana. Circuito Aguirre Beltrán SN, Col. Universitaria, CP 91000, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
Ramón I Arteaga-GaribayLaboratorio de Recursos Genéticos Microbianos, Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarios. Boulevard de la Biodiversidad 400, Rancho las Cruces, C.P. 47600. Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants contain diverse microbial communities. The associated microorganisms confer advantages to the host plant, which include growth promotion, nutrient absorption, stress tolerance, and pathogen and disease resistance. In this review, we explore how agriculture is implementing the use of microbial inoculants (single species or consortia) to improve crop yields, and discuss current strategies to study plant-associated microorganisms and how their diversity varies under unconventional agriculture. It is predicted that microbial inoculation will continue to be used in agriculture.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsMicrobial inoculantsSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID34841352
PMCPMC8610360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.