Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841341›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in microbial sciences2021

The bacteriophage decides own tracks: When they are with or against the bacteria.

Salsabil Makky, Alyaa Dawoud, Anan Safwat, Abdallah S Abdelsattar, Nouran Rezk, Ayman El-Shibiny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in microbial sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Provirus deletion frommicroLife · 2025
    Article
  10. Dietary Effects on the Gut Phageome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salsabil MakkyCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, October Gardens, 6th of October City, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Alyaa DawoudCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, October Gardens, 6th of October City, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Anan SafwatCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, October Gardens, 6th of October City, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Abdallah S AbdelsattarCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, October Gardens, 6th of October City, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Nouran RezkCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, October Gardens, 6th of October City, Giza, 12578, Egypt.
Ayman El-ShibinyCenter for Microbiology and Phage Therapy, Zewail City of Science and Technology, October Gardens, 6th of October City, Giza, 12578, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages, bacteria-infecting viruses, are considered by many researchers a promising solution for antimicrobial resistance. On the other hand, some phages have shown contribution to bacterial resistance phenomenon by transducing antimicrobial resistance genes to their bacterial hosts. Contradictory consequences of infections are correlated to different phage lifecycles. Out of four known lifecycles, lysogenic and lytic pathways have been riddles since the uncontrolled conversion between them could negatively affect the intended use of phages. However, phages still can be engineered for applications against bacterial and viral infections to ensure high efficiency. This review highlights two main aspects: (1) the different lifecycles as well as the different factors that affect lytic-lysogenic switch are discussed, including the intracellular and molecular factors control this decision. In addition, different models which describe the effect of phages on the ecosystem are compared, besides the approaches to study the switch. (2) An overview on the contribution of the phage in the evolution of the bacteria, instead of eating them, as a consequence of different mode of actions. As well, how phage display has helped in restricting phage cheating and how it could open new gates for immunization and pandemics control will be tacked.

Indexed as

Biofilmlytic-lysogenic switchPathogenic bacteriaQuorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID34841341
PMCPMC8610337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.