Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841339›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2021

Fecal bacterial communities of wild black capuchin monkeys (

Tiela Trapp Grassotti, Caroline Isabel Kothe, Janira Prichula, Nacer Mohellibi, Michele Bertoni Mann, Paulo Guilherme Carniel Wagner, Fabricio Souza Campos, Aline Alves Scarpellini Campos, Jeverson Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes Frazzon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiela Trapp GrassottiPost-Graduation Program in Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology Department, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Caroline Isabel KotheUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Janira PrichulaDepartment of Health Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Nacer MohellibiUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Michele Bertoni MannPost-Graduation Program in Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology Department, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Paulo Guilherme Carniel WagnerBrazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, IBAMA, Brasília, Brazil.
Fabricio Souza CamposLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Campus de Gurupi, Federal University of Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil; Federal University of Tocantins, Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas, TO, Brazil.
Aline Alves Scarpellini CamposState Center for Health Surveillance, State Secretariat for Health of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Jeverson FrazzonBiochemistry and Molecular Biology of Microorganisms Laboratory, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Ana Paula Guedes FrazzonPost-Graduation Program in Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology, Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology Department, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRBrazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Tocantins · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota are influenced by factors such as diet, habitat, and social contact, which directly affect the host's health. Studies related to gut microbiota in non-human primates are increasing worldwide. However, little remains known about the gut bacterial composition in wild Brazilian monkeys. Therefore, we studied the fecal microbiota composition of wild black capuchin monkey (

Indexed as

FastQC, Fast Quality ControlFecal microbiotaFROGS, Find Rapidly OTUs with Galaxy SolutionHTS, high-throughput sequencingKEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and GenomesMultiQC, Multi Quality ControlOTUs, Operational Taxonomic UnitsPGMTM, Personal Genome MachinePICRUSt2, Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved StatePrimate conservationProteobacteriaRobust capuchinsSCS, Santa Cruz do SulSSC, São Sebastião do CaíSSU, Small Subunit rRNA geneWild south Brazilian primates

Identifiers

PMID34841339
PMCPMC8610302
OpenAlexW3178845606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.