Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841307›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2021

A quadruple protection procedure for resuming pig production in small-scale ASFV-positive farms in China.

Lang Tian, Yilin Luo, Tanqing Wen, Weizheng Yang, Yulin Zhao, Pan Huang, Hongbo He, Jianmin Wu, Zhongsheng Li, Chungen Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ExposingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lang TianInstitute of Animal Protection Technology, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Yilin LuoInstitute of Animal Protection Technology, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Tanqing WenInstitute of Animal Protection Technology, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Weizheng YangLaboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Innovation Technology Center, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Yulin ZhaoLaboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Innovation Technology Center, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Pan HuangLaboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Innovation Technology Center, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Hongbo HeInstitute of Animal Protection Technology, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Jianmin WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on the Technology of Pig-breeding and Pig-disease prevention, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongsheng LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on the Technology of Pig-breeding and Pig-disease prevention, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Chungen PanLaboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Innovation Technology Center, Haid Research Institute, Guangdong Haid Group Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) outbreak has caused serious economic losses in Asia since 2018. As ASF is a new emerging disease, many farmers hesitate to raise pigs before biosafety procedures were evaluated to be effective. To support small-scale farms in resuming pig production, a comprehensive procedure, called the quadruple protection procedure (QPP), was tested in 35 small farms which had been confirmed with African swine fever virus (ASFV). The QPP takes care of the farms' construction, environmental disinfection, regular immunization, and feed quality. Qualified daily management was supplemented as well. During a one-year survey four disinfectants and one piece of equipment were used in higher frequency. A 7- or 15-day empty period after the disinfection was suitable when it was combined with the rest of the protection measures from QPP. Totally 18,730 porkers and 3,006 sows were healthy by the end of the study with percentage of 100 and 98.8, respectively, indicating that QPP could protect pigs in small-scale farms from pathogens within China. This study developed an effective protective procedure system for small-scale farms to produce pigs under the risk of ASF outbreak.

Indexed as

African swine feverDisinfectantEmpty periodRaise pig

Identifiers

PMID34841307
PMCPMC8610312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.