ArticleSTAR protocols2021
SpineRacks and SpinalJ for efficient analysis of neurons in a 3D reference atlas of the mouse spinal cord.
Article in STAR protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal circuits encode a map of the trunk to control skin twitches.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dorsal horn mapping: a Fiji toolbox for standardized laminar registration and transparent reporting of spinal cord imaging data from adult C57Bl/6 mice.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Immune cells promote paralytic disease in mice infected with enterovirus D68.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Spiral volumetric optoacoustic tomography of reduced oxygen saturation in the spinal cord of M83 mouse model of Parkinson's disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Topographical and cell type-specific connectivity of rostral and caudal forelimb corticospinal neuron populations.Cell reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial analysis of spinal neurons is currently limited by a lack of tools for efficient preparation and imaging of the whole spinal cord (SC) and the absence of a 3D reference atlas. Here, we describe protocols for efficient sectioning of whole SC using SpineRacks and subsequent image registration, atlas mapping, and 3D analysis of cells and projections, using SpinalJ. Together, these tools enable high-throughput analyses of adult mouse SC and direct comparison of spatial information of neurons between animals and studies. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Fiederling et al. (2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.