Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841200›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology

Online Search Behavior Related to COVID-19 Vaccines: Infodemiology Study.

Lawrence An, Daniel M Russell, Rada Mihalcea, Elizabeth Bacon, Scott Huffman, Ken Resnicow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of COVID-19 on Psychiatric Health in the Korean Population.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence AnCenter for Health Communications Research Rogel Cancer Center University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-1800
Daniel M RussellGoogle Mountain View, CA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7243-9317
Rada MihalceaComputer Science and Engineering Division College of Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-6703
Elizabeth BaconCenter for Health Communications Research Rogel Cancer Center University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-8004
Scott HuffmanGoogle Mountain View, CA United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-7049
Ken ResnicowCenter for Health Communications Research Rogel Cancer Center University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-9627
University of Michigan · USGoogle (United States) · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility (P and F) ProgramP30DK089503 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Kanakadurga Singer · 2010 to 2026
$20.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination against COVID-19 is an important public health strategy to address the ongoing pandemic. Examination of online search behavior related to COVID-19 vaccines can provide insights into the public's awareness, concerns, and interest regarding COVID-19 vaccination.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to describe online search behavior related to COVID-19 vaccines during the start of public vaccination efforts in the United States.

methodsWe examined Google Trends data from January 1, 2021, through March 16, 2021, to determine the relative search volume for vaccine-related searches on the internet. We also examined search query log data for COVID-19 vaccine-related searches and identified 5 categories of searches: (1) general or other information, (2) vaccine availability, (3) vaccine manufacturer, (4) vaccine side-effects and safety, and (5) vaccine myths and conspiracy beliefs. In this paper, we report on the proportion and trends for these different categories of vaccine-related searches.

resultsIn the first quarter of 2021, the proportion of all web-based search queries related to COVID-19 vaccines increased from approximately 10% to nearly 50% of all COVID-19-related queries (

conclusionsThis study demonstrates an increase in online search behavior related to COVID-19 vaccination in early 2021 along with an increase in the proportion of searches related to vaccine availability at pharmacies. These findings are consistent with an increase in public interest and intention to get vaccinated during the initial phase of public COVID-19 vaccination efforts.

Indexed as

availabilityawarenessbehaviorconcernCOVID-19infodemiologyinterestinternetmisinformationonline health informationpublicpublic healthsafetysearchside effecttrendvaccine

Identifiers

PMID34841200
PMCPMC8601025
OpenAlexW3207307480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.