Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34841107›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Organic solvent extraction and spectrophotometric quantification of total phenolic content of soil.

Nicholas Akomeng, Stephen Adusei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas AkomengDepartment of Laboratory Technology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Stephen AduseiValue Addition Division, CSIR- Oil Palm Research Institute, Kade, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenolic compounds are regarded as the most abundant plant metabolites that are known to decompose progressively into soils, likened to other soil organic materials. Once assimilated into soils, they can control soil processes, including organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling. Established that phenolic compounds can influence nutrients availability and soil quality, it becomes crucial to investigate into soil phenolics through the application of appropriate extraction technique and quantification of ​total phenolic content ​in soils. This study therefore aimed at utilizing ethanol, hexane and diethyl ether organic solvents to extract and quantify total phenolic content of soil, sampled from a vegetable growing area. Conventional organic solvent extraction method was employed to extract phenolics, while spectrophotometric technique was utilized to quantify total phenolic content. The highest extraction yield of 34.52% was achieved with ethanol followed by diethyl ether (28.23%) and hexane (25.47%). Interestingly, hexane, which had the least extraction yield, rather recorded the highest phenolics concentration of 5.50 ± 0.02 mgGAE/g, with ethanol producing a concentration of 2.04 ± 0.05 mgGAE/g and 3.82 ± 0.01 mgGAE/g for diethyl ether. The percent recovery, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of phenolic compounds were found to be 102%, 0.8 mg/g and 1.5 mg/g for ethanol; 96%, 0.6 mg/g and 1.2 mg/g for diethyl ether and 94%, 0.4 mg/g and 1.0 mg/g for hexane respectively. These results indicate that for an extraction efficiency and greater yield, the use of ethanol as solvent is preferred whereas extraction using hexane is suitable for total phenolics quantification. The findings of this study have provided a vital insight regarding the influence of organic solvents on the extractability and quantification of total phenolic content of soil.

Indexed as

Organic solventsSoilSpectrophotometryTotal phenolic content

Identifiers

PMID34841107
PMCPMC8605349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.