ReviewClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2019
Data analysis of MS-based clinical lipidomics studies with crossover design: A tutorial mini-review of statistical methods.
Review in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic Profiling of an Ultraprocessed Dietary Pattern in a Domiciled Randomized Controlled Crossover Feeding Trial.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Trial
- Computational Exploration of Phospholipid Alterations in a Human Neuroblastoma Cell Model Exposed to Amyloid-Beta.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Advancing Clinical and Pathophysiological Insights into Pancreatitis Using Lipidomics and Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Metabolomics and Lipidomics for Studying Metabolic Syndrome: Insights into Cardiovascular Diseases, Type 1 & 2 Diabetes, and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Physiological research · 2024Review
- Chewing the fat: How lipidomics is changing our understanding of human health and disease in 2022.Analytical science advances · 2023Review
- Integrated Quantitative Targeted Lipidomics and Proteomics Reveal Unique Fingerprints of Multiple Metabolic Conditions.Biomolecules · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical lipidomics using mass spectrometry (MS) is important to support discovery of biomarkers for diagnosis and understanding the pathophysiology of diseases. Frequently, lipidomics data from clinical studies have large variations among individuals because the human metabolome/lipidome is strongly influenced by genotype, daily activity, diet and gut flora. This inter-personal variability makes data analysis more complex and normally requires a large cohort for robust statistical analysis. Crossover designed experiments treat each subject as his or her own control, thereby reducing the between-subject variability, such that the effects of exposure/treatment are more likely to be identified when using a relatively small number of subjects. This design repeatedly samples an individual when crossing over from one treatment/exposure to another during the course of the study. The acquired datasets have a distinct data structure resulting from repeated longitudinal measurements. A variety of statistical methods are used in published crossover studies, but many appear to ignore the data structure inherent in the experimental design. An appropriate data analysis approach is critical to discovering robust clinical biomarkers. Hereby, we summarize the statistical methodologies suitable for clinical lipidomics studies using crossover design. To help understand and apply these methods to practical cases, we focused on the general concepts of statistical models in the context of analysis of metabolomics data without spending too much effort on mathematical details. Importantly, we aim to evaluate these methods and provide suggestions for data analysis and biomarker discovery. We applied the discussed methods on a MS-based lipidomics dataset from a double-blind random crossover designed clinical dietary intervention study. The strength and potential pitfalls of each method are briefly discussed and a suggestion for analytic workflow proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.