ArticleClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2019
A sensitive method for the simultaneous UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of milrinone and dobutamine in blood plasma using NH
Article in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Throughput Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Barbiturates in Human Urine.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Assessment of ammonium fluoride as a mobile phase additive for sensitivity gains in electrospray ionization.Analytical science advances · 2023Article
- Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dobutamine in neonates on the first days of life.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- A sensitive method for the simultaneous UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of milrinone and dobutamine in blood plasma using NHClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to develop and validate an HPLC-MS/MS method suitable for quantifying two important cardiovascular drugs, milrinone and dobutamine, in neonatal and paediatric patients' blood plasma samples. Sufficiently low LLOQ levels were required to obtain adequate pharmacokinetic data for the evaluation of optimal dosing. Since the specifics of the patient group set some restrictions on the available sample volume, the method was designed to use only 20 µL of plasma for the analysis. Analytes were separated chromatographically in a biphenyl column using a conventional water-methanol-formic acid eluent with the addition of ammonium fluoride. The latter provided a significant signal enhancement in positive ion mode detection for both analytes allowing the LLOQ to reach below 1 ng/mL. Matrix matched calibration was linear in the range of 1-300 ng/mL, between-run accuracy remained within 107-115%, and precision within 4.8-7.4% for both analytes over the calibration range (including LLOQ level). Dobutamine degradation in plasma samples was prevented by the usage of ascorbic acid. The method was applied to plasma samples of neonates from two pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics studies (n = 38).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.