Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34840938›Full record

ArticleResults in physics2021

COVID-19 anomaly detection and classification method based on supervised machine learning of chest X-ray images.

Jamal N Hasoon, Ali Hussein Fadel, Rasha Subhi Hameed, Salama A Mostafa, Bashar Ahmed Khalaf, Mazin Abed Mohammed, Jan Nedoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Results in physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 and pneumonia diagnosis from chest X-ray images using convolutional neural networks.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel deep fusion strategy for COVID-19 prediction using multimodality approach.Computers & electrical engineering : an international journal · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamal N HasoonDepartment of Computer Science, Mustansiriyah University, 10001 Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali Hussein FadelDepartment of Computer Science, University of Diyala, 32001 Diyala, Iraq.
Rasha Subhi HameedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Diyala, 32001 Diyala, Iraq.
Salama A MostafaFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Johor, Malaysia.
Bashar Ahmed KhalafDepartment of Medical Instruments Engineering Techniques, Bilad Alrafidain University College, 32001 Diyala, Iraq.
Mazin Abed MohammedCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Anbar, Anbar 31001, Iraq.
Jan NedomaDepartment of Telecommunications, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term COVID-19 is an abbreviation of Coronavirus 2019, which is considered a global pandemic that threatens the lives of millions of people. Early detection of the disease offers ample opportunity of recovery and prevention of spreading. This paper proposes a method for classification and early detection of COVID-19 through image processing using X-ray images. A set of procedures are applied, including preprocessing (image noise removal, image thresholding, and morphological operation), Region of Interest (ROI) detection and segmentation, feature extraction, (Local binary pattern (LBP), Histogram of Gradient (HOG), and Haralick texture features) and classification (K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)). The combinations of the feature extraction operators and classifiers results in six models, namely LBP-KNN, HOG-KNN, Haralick-KNN, LBP-SVM, HOG-SVM, and Haralick-SVM. The six models are tested based on test samples of 5,000 images with the percentage of training of 5-folds cross-validation. The evaluation results show high diagnosis accuracy from 89.2% up to 98.66%. The LBP-KNN model outperforms the other models in which it achieves an average accuracy of 98.66%, a sensitivity of 97.76%, specificity of 100%, and precision of 100%. The proposed method for early detection and classification of COVID-19 through image processing using X-ray images is proven to be usable in which it provides an end-to-end structure without the need for manual feature extraction and manual selection methods.

Indexed as

COVID-19 diagnosisHaralickK-nearest neighborLocal binary patternMachine learningSupport vector machineX-ray image

Identifiers

PMID34840938
PMCPMC8607738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.