Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34840856›Full record

ArticleIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

A Confidence-Based Supervised-Autonomous Control Strategy for Robotic Vaginal Cuff Closure.

Michael Kam, Hamed Saeidi, Michael H Hsieh, J U Kang, Axel Krieger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael KamDep. of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA.
Hamed SaeidiDep. of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA.
Michael H HsiehDep. of Urology, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20010, USA.
J U KangDep. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA.
Axel KriegerDep. of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USChildren's National · US

Funding

Next Generation of Surgical Imaging and Robotics for Supervised Autonomous Soft Tissue SurgeryR01EB020610 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HSIEH, MICHAEL HARRISON, KANG, JIN U · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Development and Pre-Clinical Evaluation of a Robotic System for Supervised Autonomous Tumor SurgeryR21EB024707 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KRIEGER, AXEL · 2017 to 2018
$446k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020610NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autonomous robotic suturing has the potential to improve surgery outcomes by leveraging accuracy, repeatability, and consistency compared to manual operations. However, achieving full autonomy in complex surgical environments is not practical and human supervision is required to guarantee safety. In this paper, we develop a confidence-based supervised autonomous suturing method to perform robotic suturing tasks via both Smart Tissue Autonomous Robot (STAR) and surgeon collaboratively with the highest possible degree of autonomy. Via the proposed method, STAR performs autonomous suturing when highly confident and otherwise asks the operator for possible assistance in suture positioning adjustments. We evaluate the accuracy of our proposed control method via robotic suturing tests on synthetic vaginal cuff tissues and compare them to the results of vaginal cuff closures performed by an experienced surgeon. Our test results indicate that by using the proposed confidence-based method, STAR can predict the success of pure autonomous suture placement with an accuracy of 94.74%. Moreover, via an additional 25% human intervention, STAR can achieve a 98.1% suture placement accuracy compared to an 85.4% accuracy of completely autonomous robotic suturing. Finally, our experiment results indicate that STAR using the proposed method achieves 1.6 times better consistency in suture spacing and 1.8 times better consistency in suture bite sizes than the manual results.

Identifiers

PMID34840856
PMCPMC8612028
OpenAlexW3207841303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.