Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34840795›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2021

Measuring 'self': preliminary validation of a short form of the Self Experiences Questionnaire in people with chronic pain.

Lin Yu, Whitney Scott, Rupert Goodman, Lizzie Driscoll, Lance M McCracken

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05498454 (Differential Contributions of Online Stress and Pain-explicit Mindfulness Treatment Groups to Processes, Patient Experience and Outcomes in Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05498454 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Differential Contributions of Online Stress and Pain-explicit Mindfulness Treatment Groups to Processes, Patient Experience and Outcomes in Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGovernment of JerseyRan2022 to 2023Enrolled96ConditionsChronic PainArmsBreathworks Mindfulness (Health or Stress Arm)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin YuDepartment of Psychology, Middlesex University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-9266
Whitney ScottINPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2529-9083
Rupert GoodmanINPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lizzie DriscollSalomons Institute for Applied Psychology, Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK.
Lance M McCrackenDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with chronic pain often struggle with their sense of self and this can adversely impact their functioning and well-being. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy particularly includes a process related to this struggle with self. A measure for this process, the Self Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ), was previously developed in people with chronic pain. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to validate a shorter version of the SEQ in people with chronic pain to reduce respondent burden and facilitate further research.

methodsData from 477 participants attending an interdisciplinary pain management programme were included. Participants completed measures of treatment processes (self-as-context, pain acceptance, cognitive fusion and committed action) and outcomes (pain, pain interference, work and social adjustment and depression) at baseline and post-treatment. Confirmatory factor analysis was used for item reduction. Correlations between scores from the shorter SEQ and other process and outcome variables were calculated to examine validity. Change scores of the shorter SEQ and their correlations with changes in outcome variables were examined for responsiveness.

resultsAn eight-item SEQ (SEQ-8) scale including two factors, namely Self-as-Distinction and Self-as-Observer, emerged, demonstrating good reliability (Cronbach's α = .87-.90) and validity (|r| = .14-.52). Scores from SEQ-8 significantly improved after the treatment (d = .15-21), and these improvements correlated with improvements in most outcomes.

conclusionsThe SEQ-8 appears to be a reliable and valid measure of self. This shorter format may facilitate intensive longitudinal investigation into sense of self and functioning and well-being.

Indexed as

acceptance and commitment therapychronic painself-as-contextSelf experiences questionnairesense of self

Identifiers

PMID34840795
PMCPMC8611290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.