ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
A Deep Learning-Based Text Classification of Adverse Nursing Events.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Management and Patient Safety in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Retracted: A Deep Learning-Based Text Classification of Adverse Nursing Events.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- A scoping review of deep learning in cancer nursing combined with augmented reality: The era of intelligent nursing is coming.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adverse nursing events occur suddenly, unpredictably, or unexpectedly during course of clinical diagnosis and treatment processes in the hospitals. These events adversely affect the patient's diagnosis and treatment results and even increase the patient's pain and burden. Additionally, It is high likely to cause accidents and disputes and affect normal medical work and personnel safety and is not conducive to the development of the health system. Due to the rapid development of modern medicine, health and safety of patients have become the most concerned issue in society and patient safety is an important part of medical care management. Research and events have shown that classified management of adverse nursing events, event analysis, and improvement measures are beneficial, specifically to the health system, to continuously improve the quality of medical care and reduce the occurrence of adverse nursing events. In the management of adverse nursing events, it is very important to categorize the text reports of adverse nursing events and divide these into different categories and levels. Traditional reports of adverse nursing events are mostly unstructured and simple data, often relying on manual classification, which is difficult to analyze. Furthermore, data is relatively inaccurate and practical reference significance is not obvious. In this paper, we have extensively evaluated various deep learning-based classification methods which are specifically designed for the healthcare systems. It becomes possible with the development of science and technology; text classification methods based on deep learning are gradually entering people's field of vision. Additionally, we have proposed a text classification model for adverse nursing events in the health system. Experiments and data comparison test of both the proposed deep learning-based method and existing methods in the text classification of nursing adverse events effect are performed. These results show the exceptional performance of the proposed mechanism in terms of various evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.