Qualitative Diagnosis of Liver Tumors Based on Ultrasound-Guided Automatic Biopsy.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Diagnostic superiority of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with elastography for early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients.American journal of translational research · 2025
   Article
2. Retracted: Qualitative Diagnosis of Liver Tumors Based on Ultrasound-Guided Automatic Biopsy.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Retraction · 2023-08-30Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/B1FE545AF83BA205D7B802749D61F2
• Retracted
  Retracted: Qualitative Diagnosis of Liver Tumors Based on Ultrasound-Guided Automatic Biopsy.2023

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as