Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34840663›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2021

Pan-Asian Consensus on Calcium Hydroxyapatite for Skin Biostimulation, Contouring, and Combination Treatments.

Niamh Corduff, Jeng Feng Chen, Ya Hui Chen, Ho Sung Choi, Kate Goldie, Yui Lam, Nyoman Indra Lesthari, Ting Song Lim, Suzanna Luo, Arnelle Quiambao and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Anatomical Layering Assessment: The Construction of Beauty.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 8 countries.

Niamh CorduffDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Jeng Feng ChenDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Ya Hui ChenDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Ho Sung ChoiDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Kate GoldieDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Yui LamDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Nyoman Indra LesthariDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Ting Song LimDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Suzanna LuoDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Arnelle QuiambaoDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Tuck Wah SiewDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Fang Wen TsengDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Yates Y Y ChaoDr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Tri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral usage guidelines for calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA), a dermal filler material, exist for non-Asian patients, making it necessary to determine whether their findings and consensuses are applicable to Asian patients who have distinct anatomies, cultural preferences, and aesthetic requests.

objectiveWe sought to develop a Pan-Asian consensus on CaHA use in skin biostimulation, contouring, and combination treatments for face and body indications.

methodsA survey on CaHA usage for contouring and biostimulation indications in Asian patients was conducted, followed by discussions to establish consensus statements and topics for examination.

resultsSeveral aspects of facial shaping and contouring or skin biostimulation with CaHA were agreed on, including that dilution is not a key consideration, that microfocused ultrasound with visualisation precedes CaHA in same day or session treatments, and that cannulas should be used. Among the many agreements on interventions in specific facial and body areas, there were also disagreements due to the diverse Asian patient presentations, requests, and access to tools or products; for example, CaHA should be placed in the interfascial layer for temple contouring, CaHA should not be injected directly into the infraorbital area for safety, and diluted CaHA should be injected subdermally for nonfacial or whole-face biostimulation and contouring.

conclusionOur disagreements highlight the diversity of Asian facial morphotypes and desired aesthetic outcomes and underscore the need for customized aesthetic strategies to accommodate the heterogeneity of Asian anatomies, cultural preferences, and aesthetic ideals. Establishing consensus statements on critical aspects of Asian patient considerations, efficacy and safety, is crucial. This document provides strategic guidance on the use of classic, diluted CaHA for biostimulation or undiluted Radiesse

Indexed as

Asiancalcium hydroxylapatiteconsensus statementdermal fillers

Identifiers

PMID34840663
PMCPMC8570653
OpenAlexW3217348287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.