Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34840585›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

Clinical Study of Acupotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis Based on the Meridian-Sinew Theory: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Zhijuan Hua, Han Deng, Huang Tang, Zhizhong Ruan, Pei Wang, Min Zhang, Hui Ma, Ping Wang, Can Dong, Zhilan Huang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Zhijuan HuaDaishan Community Health Service Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China.
Han DengNanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0140-693X
Huang TangNanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.
Zhizhong RuanDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210001, China.
Pei WangTaihu Sanatorium of Jiangsu Province, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214100, China.
Min ZhangSchool of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hui MaDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210017, China.
Ping WangNanjing First Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210006, China.
Can DongDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210001, China.
Zhilan HuangDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210001, China.
Hanqing HongNanjing Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China.
Quan ZhouDaishan Community Health Service Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China.
He ZhouDaishan Community Health Service Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China.
Changcheng ChengNanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-2088
Wanqi LinNanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-8499
Cairong ZhangDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1333-5785
Dechun ChenDaishan Community Health Service Center, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3248-8827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was performed to compare the effectiveness of acupotomy based on the meridian-sinew theory with acupotomy based on the anatomical theory in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). A total of 124 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized into the meridian-sinew (MS) group (63 patients) and anatomy group (61 patients). In the MS group, acupotomy based on the meridian-sinew theory was performed. In the anatomy group, acupotomy based on anatomy was applied. Patients were subgrouped by TCM Constitutions. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate treatment effectiveness. The results showed that VAS (

Identifiers

PMID34840585
PMCPMC8616694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.