Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34840457›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2021

First report on detection of

Rungrueang Yodsheewan, Manakorn Sukmak, Bencharong Sangkharak, Nongnid Kaolim, Raveewan Ploypan, Wallaya Phongphaew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. COVID-19 and Diarylamidines: The Parasitic Connection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rungrueang YodsheewanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkhen Campus, Bangkok, Thailand.
Manakorn SukmakDepartment of Farm Resources and Production Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Bencharong SangkharakDepartment of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nongnid KaolimKamphangsaen Veterinary Diagnostic Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Raveewan PloypanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkhen Campus, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wallaya PhongphaewDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkhen Campus, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kasetsart University · THDepartment of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe Sunda pangolin ( MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 128 confiscated Sunda pangolins from across different regions in Thailand were investigated. These pangolins had been admitted to a regional Wildlife Quarantine Center for rehabilitation before release in the forest. Routine physical examinations were conducted on the animals. We collected blood samples from each pangolin for hematological analysis and to detect

results

conclusionOur results provide evidence of infection of Sunda pangolins in Thailand by

Indexed as

Babesia sppManis javanicasunda pangolinThailand

Identifiers

PMID34840457
PMCPMC8613799
OpenAlexW3201604628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.