ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2021
The effect of body composition on strength and power in male and female students.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender and socio-economic differences in physical activity and fitness among rural Bangladeshi adolescents: a cross-sectional study from the 15-year follow-up of MINIMat cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bioelectrical phase angle predicts sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Are there reliable primary indicators of cardiorespiratory fitness in physically active students?International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Sex-specific influence of maturity status on jumping performance in adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gingival bleeding and lower number of natural teeth are predictive factors of low muscle strength in obese adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Are Sex Differences in Youth Weightlifting Performance Explained by Fat-Free Mass? A Controlled Analysis.Journal of strength and conditioning research · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of physical fitness and body composition in first-year bachelor sports sciences students from France and Portugal.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Motor Capabilities and Body Composition in Health vs. Non-Health University Students: A Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Associations Between Bone Age, Body Composition and Physical Performance in Icelandic 12-Year-Old Female Soccer Players.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Insights into motor impairment assessment using myographic signals with artificial intelligence: a scoping review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Article
- Wearables for health monitoring: body composition estimates of commercial smartwatch and clinical bioelectrical impedance device.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Article
- Associations between body mass index and health-related physical fitness among Chinese university students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- From BMI to TMI: revisiting adiposity and fitness assessment in young active adults through a historical and contemporary lens.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Improving the nutritional evaluation in head neck cancer patients using bioelectrical impedance analysis: Not only the phase angle matters.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Observational
- Sex differences in upper and lower strength and their association with body composition among university students.Physical activity and nutrition · 2024Article
- CCL2 signaling promotes skeletal muscle wasting in non-tumor and breast tumor models.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to determine and to compare the effect of sex differences in percentage of body fat on the strength and power performances of the legs and arms during short maximal exercise.
methods72 male and 64 female students aged 20 to 23 years were enrolled in this study. After assessing their morphological characteristics (body mass, height and percentage of fat mass), a squat jump test (SJ), a 5 successive jump test (5JT), a hand gripping (HG) and back strength (BS) tests have been conducted for each subject. Male students were re-tested after being weighed down with a weight equivalent to the mean differences in body fat recorded between the two sexes in the form of a loaded worn vest.
resultsMale are 15.7% heavier and 7.4% taller and presented a percentage of fat mass (17.2 ± 1.8%) significantly (p < 0.001) lower than that of women subject (25.0 ± 2.5%) (difference male vs female for fat mass: -45.5%). HG, BS, 5JT and SJ performances were significantly higher in males (44 ± 5 kg, 141 ± 2 kg, 11 ± 1 m and 32.4 ± 2,7 cm, respectively) than in females (31.0 ± 4 kg, 81.6 ± 13 kg, 8.7 ± 0.7 m and 21.1 ± 1.9 cm, respectively). In the control (unloaded) condition, the relative difference between males and females represented 23.5% and 34.7% of the male performances for 5JT and SJ, respectively. In the weighted condition, the relative difference between weighted males and females still represented 11.7% and 23.8% of the weighted male performances for 5JT and SJ, respectively. Cancelling the sex difference in fat mass by adding weight in males reduced by 50.1% the sex difference during 5JT and 31.4% and 71.7% for hight and power results, respectively during SJ test.
conclusionDuring short and maximal exercise, male performed better with their hands, back and legs than female students. Excess fat for female students has a disadvantageous effect on vertical and horizontal jumps performances. The persistence of sex differences after weighting of male students indicates that body fat is responsible for 30 to 70% of the observed differences between sexes performances and power outcomes during jump tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.