ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2022
Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands.
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Critical amino acid residues in human ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding and virus entry.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 infection in urban and peri-urban wildlife species from Catalonia (Spain).One health outlook · 2024Article
- Article
- Using drivers and transmission pathways to identify SARS-like coronavirus spillover risk hotspots.Nature communications · 2023Article
- SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in domestic and wildlife animals: A genomic and docking based structural comprehensive review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Serosurveillance for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibody in Feral Swine and White-Tailed Deer in Texas.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Sampling Study on SARS-CoV-2 Contamination of Air and Surfaces in a Large Meat Processing Plant Experiencing COVID-19 Clusters in June 2020.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2023Article
- Quantitative Risk Evaluation of Adventitious Agents in Heparin.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2 in animals: susceptibility of animal species, risk for animal and public health, monitoring, prevention and control.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- SARS CoV-2 infections in animals, two years into the pandemic.Archives of virology · 2022Review
- SARS-CoV-2 does not infect pigs, but this has to be verified regularly.Xenotransplantation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission and reservoir development in swine, we combined results of an experimental and two observational studies. First, intranasal and intratracheal challenge of eight pigs did not result in infection, based on clinical signs and PCR on swab and lung tissue samples. Two serum samples returned a low positive result in virus neutralization, in line with findings in other infection experiments in pigs. Next, a retrospective observational study was performed in the Netherlands in the spring of 2020. Serum samples (N =417) obtained at slaughter from 17 farms located in a region with a high human case incidence in the first wave of the pandemic. Samples were tested with protein micro array, plaque reduction neutralization test and receptor-binding-domain ELISA. None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40-80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed. Finally, an outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs on one farm, coinciding with recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected animal caretakers, was investigated. Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found. In conclusion, Although in both the experimental and the observational study few samples returned low antibody titer results in PRNT infection with SARS-CoV-2 was not confirmed. It was concluded that sporadic infections in the field cannot be excluded, but large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission among pigs is unlikely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.