Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34839786›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2022

Experimental and field investigations of exposure, replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pigs in the Netherlands.

Reina S Sikkema, Tijs Tobias, Nadia Oreshkova, Erwin de Bruin, Nisreen Okba, Felicity Chandler, Marcel M Hulst, Jordi Rodon, Manon Houben, Kees van Maanen and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quantitative Risk Evaluation of Adventitious Agents in Heparin.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Reina S SikkemaDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7331-6274
Tijs TobiasDepartment Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-9531
Nadia OreshkovaWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8830-7055
Erwin de BruinDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0826-5102
Nisreen OkbaDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2394-1079
Felicity ChandlerDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel M HulstWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-8853
Jordi RodonIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1032-9091
Manon HoubenRoyal GD Animal Health, Deventer, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-7632
Kees van MaanenRoyal GD Animal Health, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Hans BultmanRoyal GD Animal Health, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Marina MeesterDepartment Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-8546
Nora M GerhardsWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-9008
Martijn BouwknegtVion Food Group, Boxtel, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3446-5338
Bert UrlingsVion Food Group, Boxtel, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9299-4211
Bart HaagmansDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-2015
Jan KluytmansJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-6844
Corine H GeurtsvanKesselDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7678-314X
Wim H M van der PoelWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-8002
Marion P G KoopmansDepartment Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5204-2312
Arjan StegemanDepartment Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-3846
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLUtrecht University · NLWageningen University & Research · NLRoyal GD (Netherlands) · NLVion Food Group (Netherlands) · NLCentre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission and reservoir development in swine, we combined results of an experimental and two observational studies. First, intranasal and intratracheal challenge of eight pigs did not result in infection, based on clinical signs and PCR on swab and lung tissue samples. Two serum samples returned a low positive result in virus neutralization, in line with findings in other infection experiments in pigs. Next, a retrospective observational study was performed in the Netherlands in the spring of 2020. Serum samples (N =417) obtained at slaughter from 17 farms located in a region with a high human case incidence in the first wave of the pandemic. Samples were tested with protein micro array, plaque reduction neutralization test and receptor-binding-domain ELISA. None of the serum samples was positive in all three assays, although six samples from one farm returned a low positive result in PRNT (titers 40-80). Therefore we conclude that serological evidence for large scale transmission was not observed. Finally, an outbreak of respiratory disease in pigs on one farm, coinciding with recent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infected animal caretakers, was investigated. Tonsil swabs and paired serum samples were tested. No evidence for infection with SARS-CoV-2 was found. In conclusion, Although in both the experimental and the observational study few samples returned low antibody titer results in PRNT infection with SARS-CoV-2 was not confirmed. It was concluded that sporadic infections in the field cannot be excluded, but large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission among pigs is unlikely.

Indexed as

AnimalsCOVID-19Environmental ExposureNetherlandsPublic Health SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SwineSwine DiseasesantibodyCoronavirusOne HealthSARS-CoV-2Swine

Identifiers

PMID34839786
PMCPMC8725821
OpenAlexW3215110900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.