ArticleCurrent medical science2021
Outcomes of Three Different Minimal Invasive Approaches for Secundum Atrial Septal Defect Closure: A Single Institute Experience.
Article in Current medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aims of this retrospective study were to investigate and evaluate the safety and efficacy of three approaches for closure of secundum atrial septal defect (ASD).
methodsIn this study, we reviewed clinical data for transcatheter occlusion (TCO, n=63), transthoracic occlusion (TTO, n=55), and right anterolateral minithoracotomy (RALT, n=60) techniques used for ASD closure. We compared the safety and efficacy of the three approaches.
resultsASD size in the TTO group was similar to that in the RALT group (P=0.645) and significantly larger than that in the TCO group (P<0.001). The RALT group had more non-central types of ASD than the TTO and TCO groups (P=0.019 and P<0.001). The operative time in the TTO group was shorter than that in the TCO and RALT groups (P<0.001 and P<0.001). The ventilation time and intensive care unit duration were shorter in the TTO group than in the RALT group (P<0.001 and P<0.001). Hospital duration in the TCO group was shorter than that in the TTO and RALT groups (P<0.001 and P<0.001). There were no residual shunt and mortality in any group in hospital or during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications among the three groups (P=0.738).
conclusionTCO, TTO, and RALT can be performed with favorable cosmetic and clinical results for closing ASD. Appropriate patient selection is an important factor for successful closure. These techniques are promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit additional study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.