Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34839408›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Persistence is key: investigating innovative problem solving by Asian elephants using a novel multi-access box.

Sarah L Jacobson, Amanda Puitiza, Rebecca J Snyder, Ashley Sheppard, Joshua M Plotnik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The endangered brain: actively preservingRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. ScavengingPeerJ · 2022
    Article
  14. Persistence associated with extractive foraging explains variation in innovation in Darwin's finches.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L JacobsonDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA. sjacobson1112@gmail.com.
Amanda PuitizaDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Rebecca J SnyderOklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden, 2000 Remington, Place, Oklahoma City, OK, 73111, USA.
Ashley SheppardRosamond Gifford Zoo, 1 Conservation Place, Syracuse, NY, 13204, USA.
Joshua M PlotnikDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Joshua.Plotnik@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-8818
The Graduate Center, CUNY · USCity University of New York · USGifford Foundation · USOklahoma City University · US

Funding

national science foundation DGE-1646736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative problem solving is considered a hallmark measure of behavioral flexibility as it describes behavior by which an animal manipulates its environment in a novel way to reach a goal. Elephants are a highly social taxa that have demonstrated a remarkable capacity for adapting to changing environments. To understand how individual differences in behavior impact expressions of innovation, we used a novel extractive foraging device comprised of three compartments to evaluate innovation in 14 captive Asian elephants. In the first phase of testing, elephants had an opportunity to learn one solution, while the second phase gave them an opportunity to innovate to open two other compartments with different solutions. We measured the behavioral traits of neophilia, persistence, motivation, and exploratory diversity, and hypothesized that higher levels of each would be associated with more success in the second phase. Eight elephants innovated to solve three compartments, three solved two, and two solved only one. Consistent with studies in other species, we found that higher success was associated with greater persistence, but not with any other behavioral traits when analyzed per test session. Greater persistence and, unexpectedly, lower exploratory diversity, were associated with success when analyzed at the level of each individual door. Further work is needed to understand how innovation varies both within and between species, with particular attention to the potential impact of anthropogenic changes in wild environments.

Indexed as

ElephantsAnimalsCreativityLearningMotivationProblem SolvingCognitionElephantElephas maximusInnovationPersistenceProblem solving

Identifiers

PMID34839408
OpenAlexW3181396614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.