Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34839222›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of nursing studies2022

Exploring infection prevention practices in home-based nursing care: A qualitative observational study.

Benjamin Wendt, Getty Huisman-de Waal, Annick Bakker-Jacobs, Jeannine L A Hautvast, Anita Huis

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of nursing studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin WendtRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO box 9101 (114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: benjamin.wendt@radboudumc.nl.
Getty Huisman-de WaalRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO box 9101 (114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: getty.huisman-dewaal@radboudumc.nl.
Annick Bakker-JacobsRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO box 9101 (114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: annick.bakker-jacobs@radboudumc.nl.
Jeannine L A HautvastRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, PO box 9101 (149), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: jeannine.hautvast@radboudumc.nl.
Anita HuisRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO box 9101 (114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: anita.huis@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome-based nursing care continues to expand, delivering care to increasingly older clients with multiple, chronic and complex conditions that require the use of additional and more numerous invasive medical devices. Therefore, the prevention of infections poses a challenge for nurses, professional caregivers and clients.

objectiveThis article explores infection prevention practices and related behavioural factors in both nurses and clients to identify barriers and facilitators of infection prevention practices in home-based nursing care.

designA qualitative, exploratory design.

settingFour healthcare organisations providing home-based nursing care in the Netherlands.

methodsParticipant observations were used as the main source of data collection complemented with focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews.

participantsParticipant observations: 16 nurses, three professional caregivers and 80 clients. Semi-structured interviews: 11 clients. Focus group discussions: 15 nurses and four professional caregivers.

resultsA total of 87 unique care delivery situations were observed for 55 h, complemented with three focus group discussions and 11 individual semi-structured client interviews. Infection prevention practices in home-based nursing care appeared to be challenged by 1. The specific context or environment in which the care occurred, which is more autonomous, less structured, less controlled and less predictable than other care settings; 2. Suboptimal and considerable variation in professional performance concerning the application of hand hygiene and the proper use of personal protective equipment such as face masks, barrier gowns and disposable gloves; 3. Extensive use in and outside the client's surroundings of communication devices that are irregularly cleaned and tend to interrupt nursing procedures; and 4. Inadequate organisational support in the implementation and evaluation of new information or policy changes and fragmentation, variation and conflicting information regarding professional guidelines and protocols.

conclusionsFrom a first-hand observational viewpoint, this study showed that the daily practice of infection prevention in home-based nursing care appears to be suboptimal. Furthermore, this research revealed considerable variation in the work environment, the application of hand hygiene, the proper use of personal protective equipment, the handling of communication devices and organisational policies, procedures and support. Finally, the study identified a number of important barriers and facilitators of infection prevention practices in the work environment, professional and team performance, clients and organisations.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesCaregiversCommunicationFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchCommunityHand hygieneHome care servicesInfection controlInfection preventionNursingPersonal protective equipment

Identifiers

PMID34839222
OpenAlexW3212759299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.