Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34839119›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2022

Fine-grained spatial information extraction in radiology as two-turn question answering.

Surabhi Datta, Kirk Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncertainty-aware automatic TNM staging classification for [BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. quEHRy: a question answering system to query electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Surabhi DattaSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: surabhi.datta@uth.tmc.edu.
Kirk RobertsSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: kirk.roberts@uth.tmc.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Fine-Grained Spatial Information Extraction For Radiology ReportsR21EB029575 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ROBERTS, KIRK EDWARD · 2020 to 2022
$892k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB029575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRadiology reports contain important clinical information that can be used to automatically construct fine-grained labels for applications requiring deep phenotyping. We propose a two-turn question answering (QA) method based on a transformer language model, BERT, for extracting detailed spatial information from radiology reports. We aim to demonstrate the advantage that a multi-turn QA framework provides over sequence-based methods for extracting fine-grained information.

methodsOur proposed method identifies spatial and descriptor information by answering queries given a radiology report text. We frame the extraction problem such that all the main radiology entities (e.g., finding, device, anatomy) and the spatial trigger terms (denoting the presence of a spatial relation between finding/device and anatomical location) are identified in the first turn. In the subsequent turn, various other contextual information that acts as important spatial roles with respect to a spatial trigger term are extracted along with identifying the spatial and other descriptor terms qualifying a radiological entity. The queries are constructed using separate templates for the two turns and we employ two query variations in the second turn.

resultsWhen compared to the best-reported work on this task using a traditional sequence tagging method, the two-turn QA model exceeds its performance on every component. This includes promising improvements of 12, 13, and 12 points in the average F1 scores for identifying the spatial triggers, Figure, and Ground frame elements, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our experiments suggest that incorporating domain knowledge in the query (a general description about a frame element) helps in obtaining better results for some of the spatial and descriptive frame elements, especially in the case of the clinical pre-trained BERT model. We further highlight that the two-turn QA approach fits well for extracting information for complex schema where the objective is to identify all the frame elements linked to each spatial trigger and finding/device/anatomy entity, thereby enabling the extraction of more comprehensive information in the radiology domain.

conclusionExtracting fine-grained spatial information from text in the form of answering natural language queries holds potential in achieving better results when compared to more standard sequence labeling-based approaches.

Indexed as

Deep learningInformation extractionNatural language processingQuestion answeringRadiology reportSpatial information

Identifiers

PMID34839119
PMCPMC9072592
OpenAlexW3214654535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.