ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2022
Fine-grained spatial information extraction in radiology as two-turn question answering.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncertainty-aware automatic TNM staging classification for [BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Question Answering for Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review of Datasets and Models.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A scoping review of large language model based approaches for information extraction from radiology reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- quEHRy: a question answering system to query electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING WITH RADIOLOGY REPORTS, A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIES FOR LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION AND BRAIN CTA IMAGES.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRadiology reports contain important clinical information that can be used to automatically construct fine-grained labels for applications requiring deep phenotyping. We propose a two-turn question answering (QA) method based on a transformer language model, BERT, for extracting detailed spatial information from radiology reports. We aim to demonstrate the advantage that a multi-turn QA framework provides over sequence-based methods for extracting fine-grained information.
methodsOur proposed method identifies spatial and descriptor information by answering queries given a radiology report text. We frame the extraction problem such that all the main radiology entities (e.g., finding, device, anatomy) and the spatial trigger terms (denoting the presence of a spatial relation between finding/device and anatomical location) are identified in the first turn. In the subsequent turn, various other contextual information that acts as important spatial roles with respect to a spatial trigger term are extracted along with identifying the spatial and other descriptor terms qualifying a radiological entity. The queries are constructed using separate templates for the two turns and we employ two query variations in the second turn.
resultsWhen compared to the best-reported work on this task using a traditional sequence tagging method, the two-turn QA model exceeds its performance on every component. This includes promising improvements of 12, 13, and 12 points in the average F1 scores for identifying the spatial triggers, Figure, and Ground frame elements, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our experiments suggest that incorporating domain knowledge in the query (a general description about a frame element) helps in obtaining better results for some of the spatial and descriptive frame elements, especially in the case of the clinical pre-trained BERT model. We further highlight that the two-turn QA approach fits well for extracting information for complex schema where the objective is to identify all the frame elements linked to each spatial trigger and finding/device/anatomy entity, thereby enabling the extraction of more comprehensive information in the radiology domain.
conclusionExtracting fine-grained spatial information from text in the form of answering natural language queries holds potential in achieving better results when compared to more standard sequence labeling-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.