Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838201›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2022

A diagonal and social protection plus approach to meet the challenges of the COVID-19 syndemic: cash transfers and intimate partner violence interventions in Latin America.

Merike Blofield, Felicia M Knaul, Renzo Calderón-Anyosa, Amber Peterman, Juliana Martinez Franzoni, Megan O'Donnell, Flavia Bustreo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merike BlofieldGIGA Institute for Latin American Studies, Hamburg, Germany.
Felicia M KnaulUniversity of Miami Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: fknaul@gmail.com.
Renzo Calderón-AnyosaSchool of Public Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Amber PetermanDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Juliana Martinez FranzoniEscuela de Ciencias Políticas, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Megan O'DonnellCenter for Global Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Flavia BustreoFoundation Botnar Board, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latin America has been particularly hard hit by the COVID-19 syndemic, including the associated economic fallout that has threatened the livelihoods of most families. Social protection platforms and policies should have a crucial role in safeguarding individual and family wellbeing; however, the response has been insufficient to address the scale of the crisis. In this Viewpoint, we focus on two policy challenges of the COVID-19 syndemic: rapidly and effectively providing financial support to the many families that lost livelihoods, and responding to and mitigating the increased risk of intimate partner violence (IPV). We argue that building programmatic linkages between social protection platforms, particularly cash transfers, and IPV prevention, mitigation, and response services, creates synergies that can promote freedom from both poverty and violence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Financial SupportSyndemicHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceLatin AmericaPublic PolicySARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID34838201
PMCPMC8670753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.