Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838131›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

Making community voices heard in a research-health service alliance, the evolving role of the Community Advisory Group: a case study from the members' perspective.

Janet L Wale, Louisa Di Pietro, Heather Renton, Margaret Sahhar, Christine Walker, Pamela Williams, Karen Meehan, Elly Lynch, Melissa Martyn, Jane Bell and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Strategies for Presenting Research to Community Advisory Boards: Practical Tips from an HIV-focused CAB.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Janet L Wale, Brunswick, Australia. socrates111@bigpond.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-8189
Louisa Di PietroGenetic Support Network of Victoria, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Heather RentonSyndromes Without A Name (SWAN) - Australia, PO Box 390, Fairfield, VIC, 3078, Australia.
Margaret Sahhar, Malvern, Australia.
Christine WalkerChronic Illness Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.
Pamela Williams, Mount Waverley, Australia.
Karen MeehanMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Elly LynchMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Melissa MartynMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Jane Bell, Melbourne, Australia.
Ingrid WinshipThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Clara L GaffMelbourne Genomics Health Alliance, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUBreast Cancer Network Australia · AUBrunswick (United States) · USCerebral Palsy Alliance · AUFairfield Hospital · AUMalvern Community Hospital · GBThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (the Alliance) is a collaboration of leading hospitals, research and academic organisations, supported by its member organisations and the Victorian Government. The Alliance was set up by its members in 2013 to steer the translation of genomics, making it an integral part of health care in Victoria, Australia. The Community Advisory Group (CAG) was formed soon after, to give input and advice across the program. This was to ensure consideration of community values, perspectives and priorities, and knowledge translation for patient care. The CAG was charged with providing a strong community voice for the duration of the program. Appointed members were experienced consumer advocates with developed connections to the community. MAIN BODY: The Alliance progressed from an initial Demonstration Project (2013-2015) to a multifaceted program (2016-2020). The CAG worked strategically to help address complex issues, for example, communication, privacy, informed consent, ethics, patient experience, measurement and evaluation standards and policies, data storage and re-use of genomic data. Many aspects of translating genomics into routine care have been tackled, such as communicating with patients invited to have genomic testing, or their caregivers, and obtaining informed consent, clinical questions across 16 areas of health care, training and education of health and laboratory professionals, genomic data management and data-sharing. Evidence generated around clinical utility and cost-effectiveness led to government funding of testing for complex genetic conditions in children.

conclusionThe CAG activities, recorded in a CAG-inspired Activity register, span the full spectrum of information sharing and consultation to co-design and partnership. The CAG were involved at multiple levels of participation and in all tiers of activity including governance, development of policies and procedures, program planning and evaluation. Working relationships were built up and a level of trust instilled to advance the Alliance work program in ensuring an effective patient-care model of delivery of genomics. CAG input into project deliverables has been tangible. Less tangible contributions included presentations at external meetings and conferences, direct interactions at meetings with Alliance members, interactions with visitors and external experts, taking part in consultations with experts, state and federal government.

Indexed as

Community advisory groupCommunity involvementGenomicsResearch-to-clinical studyService implementation

Identifiers

PMID34838131
PMCPMC8627002
OpenAlexW3215979689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.