Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838109›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

The effect of opioid-free anesthesia protocol on the early quality of recovery after major surgery (SOFA trial): study protocol for a prospective, monocentric, randomized, single-blinded trial.

Maxime Léger, Solène Pessiot-Royer, Tristan Perrault, Elsa Parot-Schinkel, Fabienne Costerousse, Emmanuel Rineau, Sigismond Lasocki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04797312 (Comparison of an Opioid-Free Anesthesia Protocol Versus Standard Practices on Early and Late Post-operative Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04797312 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of an Opioid-Free Anesthesia Protocol Versus Standard Practices on Early and Late Post-operative Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersRan2021 to 2023Enrolled140ConditionsAnesthesia, Anesthesia, Adverse Effect, Opioid Analgesic Adverse ReactionArmsOpioid Free Anaesthesia protocol, standard practice protocol based on the use of opioids (sufentanil or remifentanil)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maxime LégerDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France. mxmleger@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-6595
Solène Pessiot-RoyerDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Tristan PerraultDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Elsa Parot-SchinkelCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Département de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie, Angers, France.
Fabienne CosterousseDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Emmanuel RineauDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Sigismond LasockiDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the 2000s, opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) protocols have been spreading worldwide in anesthesia daily practice. These protocols avoid using opioid drugs during anesthesia to prevent short- and long-term opioid side effects while ensuring adequate analgesic control and optimizing postoperative recovery. Proofs of the effect of OFA protocol on optimizing postoperative recovery are still scarce. The study aims to compare the effects of an OFA protocol versus standard anesthesia protocol on the early quality of postoperative recovery (QoR) from major surgeries.

methodsThe SOFA trial is a prospective, randomized, parallel, single-blind, monocentric study. Patients (n = 140) scheduled for major plastic, visceral, urologic, gynecologic, or ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeries will be allocated to one of the two groups. The study group (OFA group) will receive a combination of clonidine, magnesium sulfate, ketamine, and lidocaine. The control group will receive a standard anesthesia protocol based on opioid use. Both groups will receive others standard practices for general anesthesia and perioperative care. The primary outcome measure is the QoR-15 value assessed at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative data such as pain intensity, the incidence of postoperative complication, and opioid consumption will be recorded. We will also collect adverse events that may be related to the anesthetic protocol. Three months after surgery, the incidence of chronic pain and the quality of life will be evaluated by phone interview. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study powered to evaluate the effect of OFA versus a standard anesthesia protocol using opioids on global postoperative recovery after a wide range of major surgeries. The SOFA trial will also provide findings concerning the OFA impact on chronic pain incidence and long-term patient quality of life.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04797312. Registered on 15 March 2021.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidQuality of LifeAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesiaOpioid-free anesthesiaOpioid-related adverse effectsPatient-reported outcome measuresPerioperative careQuality of lifeQuality of recovery

Identifiers

PMID34838109
PMCPMC8627013
OpenAlexW3190751167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.