ArticleHuman resources for health2021
Association between supportive supervision and performance of community health workers in India: a longitudinal multi-level analysis.
Article in Human resources for health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supportive supervision visits in a large community hypertension programme in Nigeria: implementation methods and outcomes.BMJ open quality · 2025Trial
- Contribution of Community Health Workers to Strengthening the Health System in Mali: Impact and Challenges, 2010-2024.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- The evolution of supportive supervision in low- and middle-income countries.BMC global and public health · 2026Review
- Does near-vision correction improve digital data entry accuracy? A simulated within-subject crossover study among community health workers in Malawi.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Understanding the drivers of effective supportive supervision: a realist evaluation of community health worker programs in Madhya Pradesh, India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Nutrition and health status of Anganwadi workers in urban centers of Faridabad district, Haryana, India.Journal of public health research · 2025Article
- A Landscape Analysis of Supportive Supervisory Mechanisms in Maternal and Child Health Programs in India.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Capacity-building interventions for health extension workers in Ethiopia: A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of the Aarambh nurturing care model on the capacity & support structures for caregiver empowerment: A qualitative study.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Strengthening integrated community case management through digitalization and performance management in Busia County, Kenya.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between coordinated counseling from both ASHA and Anganwadi Workers and maternal health outcomes: A cross-sectional study from Madhya Pradesh and Bihar, India.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Continuing education on child development in primary care: healthcare workers' perspectives.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCommunity health workers (CHWs) deliver services at-scale to reduce maternal and child undernutrition, but often face inadequate support from the health system to perform their job well. Supportive supervision is a promising intervention that strengthens the health system and can enable CHWs to offer quality services.
objectivesWe examined if greater intensity of supportive supervision as defined by monitoring visits to Anganwadi Centre, CHW-supervisor meetings, and training provided by supervisors to CHWs in the context of Integrated Child Services Development (ICDS), a national nutrition program in India, is associated with higher performance of CHWs. Per program guidelines, we develop the performance of CHWs measure by using an additive score of nutrition services delivered by CHWs. We also tested to see if supportive supervision is indirectly associated with CHW performance through CHW knowledge.
methodsWe used longitudinal survey data of CHWs from an impact evaluation of an at-scale technology intervention in Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. Since the inception of ICDS, CHWs have received supportive supervision from their supervisors to provide services in the communities they serve. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to test if higher intensity supportive supervision was associated with improved CHW performance. The model included district fixed effects and random intercepts for the sectors to which supervisors belong.
resultsAmong 809 CHWs, the baseline proportion of better performers was 45%. Compared to CHWs who received lower intensity of supportive supervision, CHWs who received greater intensity of supportive supervision had 70% higher odds (AOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.16, 2.49) of better performance after controlling for their baseline performance, CHW characteristics such as age, education, experience, caste, timely payment of salaries, Anganwadi Centre facility index, motivation, and population served in their catchment area. A test of mediation indicated that supportive supervision is associated indirectly with CHW performance through improvement in CHW knowledge.
conclusionHigher intensity of supportive supervision is associated with improved CHW performance directly and through knowledge of CHWs. Leveraging institutional mechanisms such as supportive supervision could be important in improving service delivery to reach beneficiaries and potentially better infant and young child feeding practices and nutritional outcomes.
trial registrationTrial registration number: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN83902145.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.