Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34838019›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Using intervention mapping to develop 'ROSE': an intervention to support peer workers in overdose response settings.

Zahra Mamdani, Sophie McKenzie, Fred Cameron, Mike Knott, Jennifer Conway-Brown, Tracy Scott, Jane A Buxton, Bernie Pauly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Peer Support and Overdose Prevention Responses: A Systematic 'State-of-the-Art' Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra MamdaniBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Sophie McKenzieBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Fred CameronSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Mike KnottSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Jennifer Conway-BrownRainCity Housing, 616 Powell St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1H4, Canada.
Tracy ScottRainCity Housing, 616 Powell St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1H4, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Bernie PaulyCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada. bpauly@uvic.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4845-1383

Funding

HEALTH CANADA 1718-HQ-000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer workers (those with lived/living experience of substance use working in overdose response settings) are at the forefront of overdose response initiatives in British Columbia (BC). Working in these settings can be stressful, with lasting social, mental and emotional impacts. Peer workers have also been disproportionately burdened by the current dual public health crises characterized by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and rise in illicit drug overdose deaths. It is therefore critical to develop supports tailored specifically to their realities.

methodsWe used the six steps outlined in the Intervention Mapping (IM) framework to identify needs of peer workers and design an intervention model to support peer workers in overdose response settings.

resultsEight peer-led focus groups were conducted in community settings to identify peer workers' needs and transcripts were analyzed using interpretive description. The strategies within the intervention model were informed by organizational development theory as well as by lived/living experience of peer workers. The support needs identified by peer workers were categorized into three key themes and these formed the basis of an intervention model titled 'ROSE'; R stands for Recognition of peer work, O for Organizational support, S for Skill development and E for Everyone. The ROSE model aims to facilitate cultural changes within organizations, leading towards more equitable and just workplaces for peer workers. This, in turn, has the potential for positive socio-ecological impact.

conclusionsCentering lived/living experience in the intervention mapping process led us to develop a framework for supporting peer workers in BC. The ROSE model can be used as a baseline for other organizations employing peer workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug OverdoseSubstance-Related DisordersHumansPandemicsPeer GroupSARS-CoV-2intervention mappinglived/living experienceorganizationoverdose responsePeer workersstigmasubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34838019
PMCPMC8626711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.