Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34837966›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2021

Time-varying associations between an exposure history and a subsequent health outcome: a landmark approach to identify critical windows.

Maude Wagner, Francine Grodstein, Karen Leffondre, Cécilia Samieri, Cécile Proust-Lima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Understanding Training Load as Exposure and Dose.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maude WagnerBPH Research Center, Inserm U1219, Bordeaux University, 146 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux, France. maud.wagner@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-3218
Francine GrodsteinRUSH Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Karen LeffondreBPH Research Center, Inserm U1219, Bordeaux University, 146 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Cécilia Samieri *BPH Research Center, Inserm U1219, Bordeaux University, 146 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Cécile Proust-Lima *BPH Research Center, Inserm U1219, Bordeaux University, 146 rue Léo-Saignat, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health StudyUM1CA186107 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, STAMPFER, MEIR · 2014 to 2023
$22.3M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term behavioral and health risk factors constitute a primary focus of research on the etiology of chronic diseases. Yet, identifying critical time-windows during which risk factors have the strongest impact on disease risk is challenging. To assess the trajectory of association of an exposure history with an outcome, the weighted cumulative exposure index (WCIE) has been proposed, with weights reflecting the relative importance of exposures at different times. However, WCIE is restricted to a complete observed error-free exposure whereas exposures are often measured with intermittent missingness and error. Moreover, it rarely explores exposure history that is very distant from the outcome as usually sought in life-course epidemiology.

methodsWe extend the WCIE methodology to (i) exposures that are intermittently measured with error, and (ii) contexts where the exposure time-window precedes the outcome time-window using a landmark approach. First, the individual exposure history up to the landmark time is estimated using a mixed model that handles missing data and error in exposure measurement, and the predicted complete error-free exposure history is derived. Then the WCIE methodology is applied to assess the trajectory of association between the predicted exposure history and the health outcome collected after the landmark time. In our context, the health outcome is a longitudinal marker analyzed using a mixed model.

resultsA simulation study first demonstrates the correct inference obtained with this approach. Then, applied to the Nurses' Health Study (19,415 women) to investigate the association between body mass index history (collected from midlife) and subsequent cognitive decline (evaluated after age 70), the method identified two major critical windows of association: long before the first cognitive evaluation (roughly 24 to 12 years), higher levels of BMI were associated with poorer cognition. In contrast, adjusted for the whole history, higher levels of BMI became associated with better cognition in the last years prior to the first cognitive interview, thus reflecting reverse causation (changes in exposure due to underlying disease).

conclusionsThis approach, easy to implement, provides a flexible tool for studying complex dynamic relationships and identifying critical time windows while accounting for exposure measurement errors.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionAgedBody Mass IndexComputer SimulationEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansRisk FactorsLandmarkingLongitudinal outcomeMeasurement errorMissing dataTime-varying exposureWeighted cumulative index of exposure

Identifiers

PMID34837966
PMCPMC8627635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.