ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2021
Neural architectures in the light of comparative connectomics.
Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synaptic Organization of the Primate Retina: Toward a Human Foveal Connectome.Annual review of vision science · 2026Review
- A multi-resolution imaging and analysis pipeline for comparative circuit reconstruction in insects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- From neurons to novelty: Circuit mechanisms shaping courtship evolution.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025Review
- Comparative single-cell transcriptomic atlases of drosophilid brains suggest glial evolution during ecological adaptation.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Neuromodulation and the toolkit for behavioural evolution: can ecdysis shed light on an old problem?The FEBS journal · 2024Review
- Towards a biologically annotated brain connectome.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Comparative connectomics reveals noncanonical wiring for color vision in human foveal retina.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- A connectomics-based taxonomy of mammals.eLife · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Since the Cambrian, animals diversified from a few body forms or bauplans, into many extinct and all extant species. A characteristic neural architecture serves each bauplan. How the connectome of each animal differs from that of closely related species or whether it converged into an optimal architecture shared with more distant ones is unknown. Recent technological innovations in molecular biology, microscopy, digital data storage and processing, and computational neuroscience have lowered the barriers for whole-brain connectomics. Comparative connectomics of suitable, relatively small, representative species across the phylogenetic tree can infer the archetypal neural architecture of each bauplan and identify any circuits that possibly converged onto a shared and potentially optimal, structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.